Utility of Frailty Index in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Patients With the Same American Society of Anesthesiologists Class in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.
Thor S Stead, Tzong-Huei Herbert Chen, Andrew Maslow, Shyamal Asher
{"title":"Utility of Frailty Index in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Patients With the Same American Society of Anesthesiologists Class in Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.","authors":"Thor S Stead, Tzong-Huei Herbert Chen, Andrew Maslow, Shyamal Asher","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the utility of the five-item Modified Frailty Index (MFI-5) as a preoperative risk-stratification tool in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for patients with the same American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2008 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The NSQIP includes 685 participating hospitals in all 50 states, the majority being large, academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients undergoing VATS were identified via CPT codes in the deidentified NSQIP dataset. Patients with invalid values for any variables of interest or significant covariates were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>No interventions were applied to any patients in this retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>69,145 patients undergoing VATS were included, with the largest number having single lobectomy (32%) or unilateral wedge resection (26%). A total of 1,277 (1.8%) had unplanned reintubation, and 1,155 (1.7%) had ventilator dependence (VentDep) >48 hours after surgery. Of these patients, 66% were ASA class 3. Overall, ASA classification had a stronger correlation with both VentDep rates (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> difference: +6.1%) and reintubation rates (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> difference: +1.5%) than the MFI-5 score. However, combining ASA class with MFI-5 score was a stronger predictor for both primary outcomes than the ASA class alone (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> difference: +1.5%, p < 0.001). The MFI-5 had the strongest correlation with both outcomes among ASA class 3 patients, demonstrating exponentially increasing odds of VentDep and reintubation (MFI 3 v MFI 0: odds ratio = 5.1 [3.7, 7], p = 0.002). MFI-5 also helped classify risk within ASA class 2 patients but not as reliably as for ASA class 3 (ASA class 2 reintubation: increased probability from MFI 0-1 and 1-2; VentDep: increased probability from MFI 0-1 only, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MFI-5 is a comorbidity-based scale that can be calculated preoperatively and considers distinct, but complementary information to the ASA class. Among VATS patients with identical ASA classes 2 and 3, the MFI-5 further stratified risk for reintubation and ventilator dependence >48 hours postsurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"187-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the utility of the five-item Modified Frailty Index (MFI-5) as a preoperative risk-stratification tool in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for patients with the same American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class.
Design: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2008 to 2021.
Setting: The NSQIP includes 685 participating hospitals in all 50 states, the majority being large, academic medical centers.
Participants: All patients undergoing VATS were identified via CPT codes in the deidentified NSQIP dataset. Patients with invalid values for any variables of interest or significant covariates were excluded.
Interventions: No interventions were applied to any patients in this retrospective cohort study.
Measurements and main results: 69,145 patients undergoing VATS were included, with the largest number having single lobectomy (32%) or unilateral wedge resection (26%). A total of 1,277 (1.8%) had unplanned reintubation, and 1,155 (1.7%) had ventilator dependence (VentDep) >48 hours after surgery. Of these patients, 66% were ASA class 3. Overall, ASA classification had a stronger correlation with both VentDep rates (adjusted R2 difference: +6.1%) and reintubation rates (adjusted R2 difference: +1.5%) than the MFI-5 score. However, combining ASA class with MFI-5 score was a stronger predictor for both primary outcomes than the ASA class alone (adjusted R2 difference: +1.5%, p < 0.001). The MFI-5 had the strongest correlation with both outcomes among ASA class 3 patients, demonstrating exponentially increasing odds of VentDep and reintubation (MFI 3 v MFI 0: odds ratio = 5.1 [3.7, 7], p = 0.002). MFI-5 also helped classify risk within ASA class 2 patients but not as reliably as for ASA class 3 (ASA class 2 reintubation: increased probability from MFI 0-1 and 1-2; VentDep: increased probability from MFI 0-1 only, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: The MFI-5 is a comorbidity-based scale that can be calculated preoperatively and considers distinct, but complementary information to the ASA class. Among VATS patients with identical ASA classes 2 and 3, the MFI-5 further stratified risk for reintubation and ventilator dependence >48 hours postsurgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.