The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Amulya Kodkani, Anju R Bhalotra, Rahil Singh, Mona Arya
{"title":"The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Amulya Kodkani, Anju R Bhalotra, Rahil Singh, Mona Arya","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03430-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intravenous lidocaine is a non-opioid analgesic adjunct for perioperative pain relief. The aim of our study was to explore whether concurrent administration of intravenous lidocaine prolongs the duration of sensory block during total knee replacement (TKR) under spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized double blind controlled trial was conducted on 28 patients (14 in lidocaine group and 14 in the control group) undergoing unilateral TKR under spinal anesthesia. In the lidocaine group, intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·h<sup>-1</sup> was administered intraoperatively after spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of sensory block of spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included onset time of sensory and motor block, duration of motor block, time to first postoperative analgesic, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and postoperative analgesia requirement in 24 h after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of sensory and motor block was longer in the lidocaine group (Mean ± SD; 112.50 ± 5.80 min versus 78.21 ± 9.12 min; p < 0.001 and 237.14 ± 9.14 min versus 215.00 ± 10.12 min; p < 0.001, respectively). Time to requirement of first rescue analgesia was 184.29 ± 9.38 min in the lidocaine group and 127.14 ± 23.35 min in the control group (p < 0.001). VAS scores were lower in the lidocaine group at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00001, p < 0.00006, p = 0.032, respectively). Requirement of additional analgesia in the first 24 h was higher in the control group. There were no clinical signs to suggest lidocaine toxicity in any patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During unilateral TKR under spinal anaesthesia, concurrent use of intravenous lidocaine prolonged sensory block and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03430-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intravenous lidocaine is a non-opioid analgesic adjunct for perioperative pain relief. The aim of our study was to explore whether concurrent administration of intravenous lidocaine prolongs the duration of sensory block during total knee replacement (TKR) under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods: This prospective randomized double blind controlled trial was conducted on 28 patients (14 in lidocaine group and 14 in the control group) undergoing unilateral TKR under spinal anesthesia. In the lidocaine group, intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg·kg-1 followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg·kg-1·h-1 was administered intraoperatively after spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of sensory block of spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included onset time of sensory and motor block, duration of motor block, time to first postoperative analgesic, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and postoperative analgesia requirement in 24 h after surgery.

Results: The duration of sensory and motor block was longer in the lidocaine group (Mean ± SD; 112.50 ± 5.80 min versus 78.21 ± 9.12 min; p < 0.001 and 237.14 ± 9.14 min versus 215.00 ± 10.12 min; p < 0.001, respectively). Time to requirement of first rescue analgesia was 184.29 ± 9.38 min in the lidocaine group and 127.14 ± 23.35 min in the control group (p < 0.001). VAS scores were lower in the lidocaine group at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00001, p < 0.00006, p = 0.032, respectively). Requirement of additional analgesia in the first 24 h was higher in the control group. There were no clinical signs to suggest lidocaine toxicity in any patient.

Conclusion: During unilateral TKR under spinal anaesthesia, concurrent use of intravenous lidocaine prolonged sensory block and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements.

静脉注射利多卡因对接受全膝关节置换术患者蛛网膜下腔麻醉的影响:随机对照试验。
目的:静脉注射利多卡因是一种非阿片类镇痛药,可用于围手术期镇痛。我们的研究旨在探讨在脊髓麻醉下进行全膝关节置换术(TKR)时,同时静脉注射利多卡因是否能延长感觉阻滞的持续时间:这项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验针对在脊髓麻醉下接受单侧全膝关节置换术的 28 名患者(利多卡因组 14 人,对照组 14 人)进行。利多卡因组在脊髓麻醉后术中静脉注射利多卡因 1.5 mg-kg-1,然后输注 1.5 mg-kg-1-h-1。主要结果是脊髓麻醉的感觉阻滞持续时间。次要结果包括感觉和运动阻滞开始时间、运动阻滞持续时间、术后首次使用镇痛药时间、术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及术后 24 小时内的镇痛需求:结果:利多卡因组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间更长(平均值±标准差;112.50±5.80 分钟对 78.21±9.12分钟;P在脊髓麻醉下进行单侧 TKR 时,同时静脉注射利多卡因可延长感觉阻滞时间并减少术后镇痛剂的需求量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信