Sodium-chloride difference is not strongly correlated with base excess in chronic kidney disease: an anion gap problem.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Moritz Kerbl-Knapp, Gregor Lindner, Georg-Christian Funk, Christoph Schwarz
{"title":"Sodium-chloride difference is not strongly correlated with base excess in chronic kidney disease: an anion gap problem.","authors":"Moritz Kerbl-Knapp, Gregor Lindner, Georg-Christian Funk, Christoph Schwarz","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04274-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of metabolic acidosis is high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). For the diagnosis, a blood gas analysis is necessary, but not always available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the base excess (BE) of the sodium-chloride difference (BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> = Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>-</sup>-34 mmol/l) as a screening parameter for hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Methods and statistical analysis: </strong>We retrospectively performed acid-base analyses of 168 non-dialysed patients with CKD according to the physiologic and to the Stewart's approach. We performed linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> and BE to evaluate the accuracy of BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> predicting the BE. We further investigated possible confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The corrected R<sup>2</sup> for the correlation of BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> and BE was 0.60 (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed a good overall agreement. The bias was negligible, but the 95%-limits of agreement showed a wide interval (10.4 mmol/l). For BE ≤ 2 mmol/l, the ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.89 and moderate sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.86) for the optimal BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> threshold (≤ 2 mmol/l). Subgroup analysis showed similar results. The main factor for the imprecision of BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> predicting the BE across all stages of CKD is the variability of the serum anion gap (SAG).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> is not an adequate parameter for screening of hyperchloremic acidosis because of the high variability of the SAG. Only, if the BE<sub>Na-Cl</sub> is ≤ 5 mmol/l, a hyperchloremic acidosis should be suspected. Therefore, a complete blood gas analysis is necessary for the correct diagnosis of acid-base disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04274-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of metabolic acidosis is high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). For the diagnosis, a blood gas analysis is necessary, but not always available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the base excess (BE) of the sodium-chloride difference (BENa-Cl = Na+-Cl--34 mmol/l) as a screening parameter for hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.

Methods and statistical analysis: We retrospectively performed acid-base analyses of 168 non-dialysed patients with CKD according to the physiologic and to the Stewart's approach. We performed linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of BENa-Cl and BE to evaluate the accuracy of BENa-Cl predicting the BE. We further investigated possible confounding factors.

Results: The corrected R2 for the correlation of BENa-Cl and BE was 0.60 (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed a good overall agreement. The bias was negligible, but the 95%-limits of agreement showed a wide interval (10.4 mmol/l). For BE ≤ 2 mmol/l, the ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.89 and moderate sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.86) for the optimal BENa-Cl threshold (≤ 2 mmol/l). Subgroup analysis showed similar results. The main factor for the imprecision of BENa-Cl predicting the BE across all stages of CKD is the variability of the serum anion gap (SAG).

Conclusions: The BENa-Cl is not an adequate parameter for screening of hyperchloremic acidosis because of the high variability of the SAG. Only, if the BENa-Cl is ≤ 5 mmol/l, a hyperchloremic acidosis should be suspected. Therefore, a complete blood gas analysis is necessary for the correct diagnosis of acid-base disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease.

钠-氯差异与慢性肾病患者碱过量的关系不大:阴离子间隙问题。
介绍:代谢性酸中毒在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中发病率很高。诊断时需要进行血气分析,但并非总能获得血气分析结果。本研究旨在评估钠氯差值的碱过量(BE)(BENa-Cl = Na+-Cl--34 mmol/l),作为高氯代谢性酸中毒的筛查参数:我们根据生理学方法和斯图尔特方法对 168 名非透析的 CKD 患者进行了回顾性酸碱分析。我们对 BENa-Cl 和 BE 进行了线性回归分析、Bland-Altman 图和接收器操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估 BENa-Cl 预测 BE 的准确性。我们还进一步调查了可能的混杂因素:结果:BENa-Cl和BE的相关性校正R2为0.60(p Na-Cl阈值(≤ 2 mmol/l))。分组分析显示了相似的结果。血清阴离子间隙(SAG)的可变性是导致 BENa-Cl 在 CKD 各个阶段预测 BE 不精确的主要因素:结论:BENa-Cl 并不是筛查高氯性酸中毒的适当参数,因为 SAG 的变异性很大。只有当 BENa-Cl ≤ 5 mmol/l 时,才应怀疑高胆酸血症酸中毒。因此,要正确诊断慢性肾病患者的酸碱紊乱,必须进行全面的血气分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信