Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis (the MSUG94 group).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yuki Yokoyama, Makoto Kawase, Shin Ebara, Tomoyuki Tatenuma, Takeshi Sasaki, Yoshinori Ikehata, Akinori Nakayama, Masahiro Toide, Tatsuaki Yoneda, Kazushige Sakaguchi, Jun Teishima, Kazuhide Makiyama, Takahiro Inoue, Hiroshi Kitamura, Kazutaka Saito, Fumitaka Koga, Shinji Urakami, Takuya Koie
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis (the MSUG94 group).","authors":"Yuki Yokoyama, Makoto Kawase, Shin Ebara, Tomoyuki Tatenuma, Takeshi Sasaki, Yoshinori Ikehata, Akinori Nakayama, Masahiro Toide, Tatsuaki Yoneda, Kazushige Sakaguchi, Jun Teishima, Kazuhide Makiyama, Takahiro Inoue, Hiroshi Kitamura, Kazutaka Saito, Fumitaka Koga, Shinji Urakami, Takuya Koie","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04268-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal neoadjuvant regimen before radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be determined. This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with HR-PCa undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the datasets of 1023 subjects who underwent RALP at nine Japanese facilities between September 2012 and October 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups using propensity score matching: a RALP-alone group and those who underwent NCHT followed by RALP (NCHT group). The NCHT regimen consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and tegafur-uracil for at least 3 months before RALP. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RALP. The secondary endpoint was the surgical specimen pathology findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching identified 139 individuals for each group. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. During follow-up, BCR was observed in 41 patients (29.5%) in the RALP-alone group and 22 patients (15.8%) in the NCHT group (p = 0.010). Pathological results showed significantly more organ-confined PCa and significantly fewer positive surgical margins or lymphovascular invasion in the NCHT group than in the RALP-alone group. The 2-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was 72.7% and 74.7% in the RALP-alone and NCHT groups, respectively (p = 0.086). Two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 liver disorder as an NCHT-related adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that NCHT can safely treat HR-PCa and may reduce the incidence of BCR when combined with RALP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04268-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal neoadjuvant regimen before radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be determined. This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with HR-PCa undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods: We reviewed the datasets of 1023 subjects who underwent RALP at nine Japanese facilities between September 2012 and October 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups using propensity score matching: a RALP-alone group and those who underwent NCHT followed by RALP (NCHT group). The NCHT regimen consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and tegafur-uracil for at least 3 months before RALP. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RALP. The secondary endpoint was the surgical specimen pathology findings.

Results: Propensity score matching identified 139 individuals for each group. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. During follow-up, BCR was observed in 41 patients (29.5%) in the RALP-alone group and 22 patients (15.8%) in the NCHT group (p = 0.010). Pathological results showed significantly more organ-confined PCa and significantly fewer positive surgical margins or lymphovascular invasion in the NCHT group than in the RALP-alone group. The 2-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was 72.7% and 74.7% in the RALP-alone and NCHT groups, respectively (p = 0.086). Two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 liver disorder as an NCHT-related adverse event.

Conclusion: The results suggest that NCHT can safely treat HR-PCa and may reduce the incidence of BCR when combined with RALP.

采用机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺癌的新辅助化疗激素疗法的疗效和安全性:倾向得分匹配分析(MSUG94组)。
目的:高危(HR)前列腺癌(PCa)患者根治性前列腺切除术(RP)前的最佳新辅助治疗方案仍有待确定。这项回顾性多中心队列研究评估了接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RALP)的高危前列腺癌患者接受新辅助化疗(NCHT)的有效性和安全性:我们回顾了2012年9月至2023年10月期间在日本九家医疗机构接受RALP手术的1023名受试者的数据集。采用倾向评分匹配法将入组患者分为两组:单独接受 RALP 组和接受 NCHT 后再接受 RALP 组(NCHT 组)。NCHT方案包括在RALP前至少3个月使用促黄体生成素释放激素拮抗剂和替加氟脲嘧啶。主要终点是RALP后的生化复发(BCR)。次要终点是手术标本病理结果:倾向评分匹配为每组确定了 139 人。中位随访时间为 18.2 个月。在随访期间,RALP-alone 组有 41 名患者(29.5%)观察到 BCR,NCHT 组有 22 名患者(15.8%)观察到 BCR(P = 0.010)。病理结果显示,NCHT 组器官封闭性 PCa 明显多于 RALP-alone 组,手术切缘阳性或淋巴管侵犯明显少于 RALP-alone 组。RALP-单纯组和NCHT组的2年无生化复发生存率(BRFS)分别为72.7%和74.7%(P = 0.086)。两名患者(1.4%)出现了与NCHT相关的3级肝功能紊乱不良事件:结果表明,NCHT 可以安全地治疗 HR-PCa,与 RALP 联合使用可降低 BCR 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信