Safety and reliability of ultrasound-assisted reduction in the conservative management of completely displaced paediatric distal radius fractures.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound-assisted reduction in the conservative management of completely displaced pediatric distal radius fractures.

Methods: The efficacy of ultrasound-assisted reduction versus conventional reduction was compared in a single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study involving 51 consecutive paediatric patients with completely displaced distal radius fractures, following manual reduction, from May 2021 to May 2023. The study group received ultrasound-assisted reduction (n = 24), while the control group underwent conventional blind manual reduction (n = 27). Comparative analysis included general clinical data, initial reduction success rates, frequency of exposure to radiation during reduction, post-reduction alignment rates, post-reduction angulation, re-displacement rates, conservative treatment failure rates, pain scores, and wrist joint scores at the last follow-up.

Results: All enrolled cases underwent manual reduction and conservative management. In the study group, all 24 patients underwent successful initial reduction procedures, with only one exposure to radiation during the entire process. Notably, no patient experienced re-displacement while in plaster, and the conservative treatment proved effective. The reduction and positioning rates were impressive, with success rates of 86.63 ± 3.65% in the coronal plane and 94.79 ± 3.06% in the sagittal plane. Furthermore, the post-reduction angulation was only 3.58 ± 0.65 degrees in the coronal plane and 8.70 ± 1.45 degrees in the sagittal plane. By contrast, within the control group comprising 27 patients, only 15 achieved successful initial reductions. Unfortunately, 12 patients required multiple exposure to radiation throughout the procedure. Furthermore, nine patients underwent re-displacement while in plaster and seven did not achieve successful conservative treatment. The alignment rates of the control group were similar to those of the study group (84.67 ± 4.35% in the coronal plane and 82.56 ± 5.45% in the sagittal plane). Similarly, the post-reduction angulation remained consistent, measuring 3.93 ± 0.87 degrees in the coronal plane and 12.03 ± 1.32 degrees in the sagittal plane. There were no statistically significant differences in pain scores during the process of fracture reduction and in wrist joint function scores at the final follow-up (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Ultrasound-assisted reduction in the conservative management of completely displaced paediatric distal radius fractures can enhance the initial reduction success rate, decrease the risk of subsequent redisplacement, minimize patient exposure to radiation, and yield favorable clinical outcomes. It is a safe and reliable approach.