Su-Wen Anne Mak, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Simone Meiqi Ong, Cheryl Xi Zi Chong, Hong Liang Chua, Jill Cheng Sim Lee
{"title":"A New Combined Urogynecology and Colorectal Surgery Pelvic Floor Clinic-1 Year On.","authors":"Su-Wen Anne Mak, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Simone Meiqi Ong, Cheryl Xi Zi Chong, Hong Liang Chua, Jill Cheng Sim Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.
Results: Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.
Conclusions: Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion