Nicole Unger-Manhart, Martina Morokutti-Kurz, Petra Zieglmayer, Antonella Russo, Cornelia Siegl, Marielle König-Schuster, Christiane Koller, Philipp Graf, Christine Graf, Patrick Lemell, Markus Savli, René Zieglmayer, Hanna Dellago, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer
{"title":"Decongestant Effect of \"Coldamaris Akut\", a Carrageenan- and Sorbitol-Containing Nasal Spray in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Nicole Unger-Manhart, Martina Morokutti-Kurz, Petra Zieglmayer, Antonella Russo, Cornelia Siegl, Marielle König-Schuster, Christiane Koller, Philipp Graf, Christine Graf, Patrick Lemell, Markus Savli, René Zieglmayer, Hanna Dellago, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S476707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a hyperosmolar, barrier-forming nasal spray based on carrageenan and sorbitol, and to demonstrate its decongestant effect in the context of allergic rhinitis (AR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The efficacy of the nasal spray components was tested in vitro by barrier function, virus replication inhibition, and water absorption assays. The decongestant effectiveness was assessed in a randomized, controlled, crossover environmental chamber trial, where participants with a history of seasonal grass pollen AR were exposed to grass pollen allergens under controlled conditions. Forty-one adults were randomized to receive either carrageenan- and sorbitol-containing nasal spray (CS) or saline solution (SS). After 1 week, participants repeated the exposure with the treatment they had not received before. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in nasal congestion symptom score (NCSS). Secondary efficacy endpoints were nasal airflow, nasal secretion, total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and total respiratory symptom score (TRSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preclinical assays demonstrated barrier-building, virus-blocking, and water-withdrawing properties of the CS components. In the clinical study, there was no significant difference in mean NCSS change from pre- to post-treatment between CS and SS. However, nasal airflow increased over time after treatment with CS, while it declined after SS, leading to a growing difference in airflow between CS and SS (p = 0.04 at 6:00 h). Mean nasal secretion over 2-6 h was reduced by ~25% after CS (p = 0.003) compared to pre-treatment, while it was reduced by only ~16% after SS (p = 0.137). No significant differences in TNSS, TOSS and TRSS were observed between CS and SS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS improves nasal airflow and reduces nasal secretion in adults with AR. We propose CS as a safe and effective adjuvant to baseline pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04532762.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"5105-5121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S476707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a hyperosmolar, barrier-forming nasal spray based on carrageenan and sorbitol, and to demonstrate its decongestant effect in the context of allergic rhinitis (AR).
Methods: The efficacy of the nasal spray components was tested in vitro by barrier function, virus replication inhibition, and water absorption assays. The decongestant effectiveness was assessed in a randomized, controlled, crossover environmental chamber trial, where participants with a history of seasonal grass pollen AR were exposed to grass pollen allergens under controlled conditions. Forty-one adults were randomized to receive either carrageenan- and sorbitol-containing nasal spray (CS) or saline solution (SS). After 1 week, participants repeated the exposure with the treatment they had not received before. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in nasal congestion symptom score (NCSS). Secondary efficacy endpoints were nasal airflow, nasal secretion, total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and total respiratory symptom score (TRSS).
Results: Preclinical assays demonstrated barrier-building, virus-blocking, and water-withdrawing properties of the CS components. In the clinical study, there was no significant difference in mean NCSS change from pre- to post-treatment between CS and SS. However, nasal airflow increased over time after treatment with CS, while it declined after SS, leading to a growing difference in airflow between CS and SS (p = 0.04 at 6:00 h). Mean nasal secretion over 2-6 h was reduced by ~25% after CS (p = 0.003) compared to pre-treatment, while it was reduced by only ~16% after SS (p = 0.137). No significant differences in TNSS, TOSS and TRSS were observed between CS and SS.
Conclusion: CS improves nasal airflow and reduces nasal secretion in adults with AR. We propose CS as a safe and effective adjuvant to baseline pharmacological treatments.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.