The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
David M Hannon, Jaffar David Abbas Syed, Bairbre McNicholas, Michael Madden, John G Laffey
{"title":"The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning.","authors":"David M Hannon, Jaffar David Abbas Syed, Bairbre McNicholas, Michael Madden, John G Laffey","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00682-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has a high morbidity and mortality. One therapy that can decrease mortality is ventilation in the prone position (PP). Patients undergoing PP are amongst the sickest, and there is a need for early identification of patients at particularly high risk of death. These patients may benefit from an in-depth review of treatment or consideration of rescue therapies. We report the development of a machine learning model trained to predict early mortality in patients undergoing prone positioning as part of the management of their ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected clinical data were analysed retrospectively from a single tertiary ICU. The records of patients who underwent an initial session of prone positioning whilst receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were identified (n = 131). The decision to perform prone positioning was based on the criteria in the PROSEVA study. A C5.0 classifier algorithm with adaptive boosting was trained on data gathered before, during, and after initial proning. Data was split between training (85% of data) and testing (15% of data). Hyperparameter tuning was achieved through a grid-search using a maximal entropy configuration. Predictions for 7-day mortality after initial proning session were made on the training and testing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model demonstrated good performance in predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.89 training, 0.78 testing). Seven variables were used for prediction. Sensitivity was 0.80 and specificity was 0.67 on the testing data set. Patients predicted to survive had 13.3% mortality, while those predicted to die had 66.67% mortality. Among patients in whom the model predicted patient would survive to day 7 based on their response, mortality at day 7 was 13.3%. Conversely, if the model predicted the patient would not survive to day 7, mortality was 66.67%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proof-of-concept study shows that with a limited data set, a C5.0 classifier can predict 7-day mortality from a number of variables, including the response to initial proning, and identify a cohort at significantly higher risk of death. This can help identify patients failing conventional therapies who may benefit from a thorough review of their management, including consideration of rescue treatments, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study shows the potential of a machine learning model to identify ARDS patients at high risk of early mortality following PP. This information can guide clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies and considering rescue therapies. Further validation in larger cohorts is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00682-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has a high morbidity and mortality. One therapy that can decrease mortality is ventilation in the prone position (PP). Patients undergoing PP are amongst the sickest, and there is a need for early identification of patients at particularly high risk of death. These patients may benefit from an in-depth review of treatment or consideration of rescue therapies. We report the development of a machine learning model trained to predict early mortality in patients undergoing prone positioning as part of the management of their ARDS.

Methods: Prospectively collected clinical data were analysed retrospectively from a single tertiary ICU. The records of patients who underwent an initial session of prone positioning whilst receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were identified (n = 131). The decision to perform prone positioning was based on the criteria in the PROSEVA study. A C5.0 classifier algorithm with adaptive boosting was trained on data gathered before, during, and after initial proning. Data was split between training (85% of data) and testing (15% of data). Hyperparameter tuning was achieved through a grid-search using a maximal entropy configuration. Predictions for 7-day mortality after initial proning session were made on the training and testing data.

Results: The model demonstrated good performance in predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.89 training, 0.78 testing). Seven variables were used for prediction. Sensitivity was 0.80 and specificity was 0.67 on the testing data set. Patients predicted to survive had 13.3% mortality, while those predicted to die had 66.67% mortality. Among patients in whom the model predicted patient would survive to day 7 based on their response, mortality at day 7 was 13.3%. Conversely, if the model predicted the patient would not survive to day 7, mortality was 66.67%.

Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study shows that with a limited data set, a C5.0 classifier can predict 7-day mortality from a number of variables, including the response to initial proning, and identify a cohort at significantly higher risk of death. This can help identify patients failing conventional therapies who may benefit from a thorough review of their management, including consideration of rescue treatments, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study shows the potential of a machine learning model to identify ARDS patients at high risk of early mortality following PP. This information can guide clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies and considering rescue therapies. Further validation in larger cohorts is needed.

在有限的数据集中开发 C5.0 机器学习模型,以预测接受俯卧位初始治疗的 ARDS 患者的早期死亡率。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发病率和死亡率都很高。一种可以降低死亡率的疗法是俯卧位通气(PP)。接受俯卧位通气的患者病情最重,因此需要及早识别死亡风险特别高的患者。这些患者可能会受益于治疗的深入审查或抢救疗法的考虑。我们报告了一种机器学习模型的开发情况,该模型经过训练可预测接受俯卧位治疗的患者的早期死亡率,作为 ARDS 治疗的一部分:我们对一家三级重症监护病房前瞻性收集的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。确定了在接受有创机械通气的同时接受首次俯卧位的患者记录(n = 131)。根据 PROSEVA 研究的标准决定是否进行俯卧位。在初始俯卧位之前、期间和之后收集的数据上训练了带有自适应增强功能的 C5.0 分类器算法。数据分为训练(85% 的数据)和测试(15% 的数据)两部分。超参数调整是通过使用最大熵配置的网格搜索实现的。根据训练数据和测试数据对初次刺杀后 7 天的死亡率进行预测:该模型在预测 7 天死亡率方面表现良好(AUROC:0.89 培训值,0.78 测试值)。预测使用了七个变量。测试数据集的灵敏度为 0.80,特异度为 0.67。预测存活的患者死亡率为 13.3%,预测死亡的患者死亡率为 66.67%。根据患者的反应,模型预测患者将存活到第 7 天,在这些患者中,第 7 天的死亡率为 13.3%。相反,如果模型预测患者无法存活到第 7 天,死亡率则为 66.67%:这项概念验证研究表明,利用有限的数据集,C5.0 分类器可以通过包括对初始降温的反应在内的多个变量预测 7 天的死亡率,并识别出死亡风险明显较高的人群。这有助于识别常规疗法失败的患者,这些患者可能受益于对其管理的全面审查,包括考虑体外膜肺氧合等抢救治疗。这项研究表明,机器学习模型具有识别ARDS患者PP后早期死亡高风险的潜力。这些信息可以指导临床医生调整治疗策略和考虑抢救治疗。还需要在更大的队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信