Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Post Using Various Post Space Irrigation Treatments.

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8647515
Amir Mohammad Shahrokhi, Amir Ali Shahrokhi, Raoufeh Asghari, Mehdi Badiee, Kaveh Seyedan
{"title":"Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Post Using Various Post Space Irrigation Treatments.","authors":"Amir Mohammad Shahrokhi, Amir Ali Shahrokhi, Raoufeh Asghari, Mehdi Badiee, Kaveh Seyedan","doi":"10.1155/2024/8647515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to provide the impact of different endodontic irrigation treatments after post space preparation on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to dentin using self-adhesive cements. <b>Methods and Materials:</b> A total of 180 extracted premolar teeth were selected. The canals were instrumented by and then were filled. After preparing the post space, teeth were divided into 12 groups according to irrigants (normal saline solution; 17% EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid] + 5.25% NaOCl [sodium hypochlorite]; 17% EDTA; 5.25% NaOCl; and 1.2% chlorhexidine [CHX]) and irrigation technique (conventional syringe irrigation [CSI] and passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). After cementation, the samples were sectioned to obtain 1-mm disks from coronal and apical parts, a push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine (Z050, Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany) at a speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U tests. <b>Results:</b> The push-out bond strength was higher in coronal segment in comparison to apical segment. The highest push-out bond strength value was related to NaOCl + EDTA using PUI (12.39 ± 1.08). There are significant differences when comparing NaOCl + EDTA group with EDTA group using CSI or PUI technique (<i>p</i>  < 0.05) except in coronal region with CSI technique. In both apical and coronal regions, phosphoric acid irrigation was found to be similar to normal saline solution and CHX groups regardless of activation technique. <b>Conclusion:</b> The push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by the irrigation protocol. Using PUI and 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl in apical region could be an effective irrigant for smear layer removal after post space preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8647515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8647515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to provide the impact of different endodontic irrigation treatments after post space preparation on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts to dentin using self-adhesive cements. Methods and Materials: A total of 180 extracted premolar teeth were selected. The canals were instrumented by and then were filled. After preparing the post space, teeth were divided into 12 groups according to irrigants (normal saline solution; 17% EDTA [ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid] + 5.25% NaOCl [sodium hypochlorite]; 17% EDTA; 5.25% NaOCl; and 1.2% chlorhexidine [CHX]) and irrigation technique (conventional syringe irrigation [CSI] and passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). After cementation, the samples were sectioned to obtain 1-mm disks from coronal and apical parts, a push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine (Z050, Zwick/Roell, Ulm, Germany) at a speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The push-out bond strength was higher in coronal segment in comparison to apical segment. The highest push-out bond strength value was related to NaOCl + EDTA using PUI (12.39 ± 1.08). There are significant differences when comparing NaOCl + EDTA group with EDTA group using CSI or PUI technique (p  < 0.05) except in coronal region with CSI technique. In both apical and coronal regions, phosphoric acid irrigation was found to be similar to normal saline solution and CHX groups regardless of activation technique. Conclusion: The push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by the irrigation protocol. Using PUI and 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl in apical region could be an effective irrigant for smear layer removal after post space preparation.

使用不同后空间灌溉处理的纤维加固支柱的推出粘接强度。
目的:本研究旨在提供牙髓柱间隙预备后不同牙髓冲洗处理对使用自粘性水门汀的纤维桩与牙本质的推出粘接强度的影响。方法和材料:共选择了 180 颗拔除的前磨牙。对牙槽骨进行器械处理,然后进行填充。准备好桩间隙后,根据灌洗剂(生理盐水;17% EDTA [乙二胺四乙酸] + 5.25% NaOCl [次氯酸钠];17% EDTA;5.25% NaOCl;1.2% 洗必泰 [CHX])和灌洗技术(传统注射器灌洗 [CSI] 和被动超声波灌洗 [PUI])将牙齿分为 12 组。粘结后,从冠状部和根尖部切取 1 毫米的牙盘,使用万能试验机(Z050,Zwick/Roell,德国乌尔姆)以 1 毫米/分钟的速度进行推出试验。数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析。结果与根尖段相比,冠状段的推出粘接强度更高。使用 PUI 的 NaOCl + EDTA 的推出粘接强度值最高(12.39 ± 1.08)。使用 CSI 或 PUI 技术的 NaOCl + EDTA 组与 EDTA 组相比有明显差异(P < 0.05),但使用 CSI 技术的冠状区除外。在根尖和冠状区,磷酸灌洗与生理盐水组和 CHX 组相似,而与激活技术无关。结论推出粘接强度值受到冲洗方案的显著影响。在根尖区使用 PUI 和 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl 是一种有效的灌洗剂,可以在后牙间隙预备后去除涂抹层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信