Loneliness as a Predictor of Disability in Older Adults: Implications of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Cutoff Score Across Cultural Contexts

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ju-Ling Chiu, Lien-Chung Wei
{"title":"Loneliness as a Predictor of Disability in Older Adults: Implications of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Cutoff Score Across Cultural Contexts","authors":"Ju-Ling Chiu,&nbsp;Lien-Chung Wei","doi":"10.1002/gps.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This letter responds to the study by Tomida et al. (2024) that validates the optimal cutoff score for the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) to predict disability among older Japanese adults. The study identifies a cutoff score of 44, providing a significant indicator for the early detection of at-risk individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To discuss the implications of the identified cutoff score for public health and clinical practice, including its potential for early intervention and cross-cultural validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This commentary critically analyzes the findings of Tomida et al. (2024) and situates them within the broader literature on loneliness, disability, and aging. It also considers the multifactorial aspects of loneliness and disability in older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The UCLA-LS cutoff score of 44 serves as a practical benchmark for clinicians, which can be integrated into routine health assessments to identify individuals at risk. We underscore the need for additional research on cross-cultural validation and mechanisms linking loneliness to disability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We advocate for incorporating social support measures into standard care for older adults to mitigate the effects of loneliness on disability. This letter suggests future research directions, including exploring the causal pathways between loneliness and disability and developing culturally appropriate interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This letter responds to the study by Tomida et al. (2024) that validates the optimal cutoff score for the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) to predict disability among older Japanese adults. The study identifies a cutoff score of 44, providing a significant indicator for the early detection of at-risk individuals.

Objective

To discuss the implications of the identified cutoff score for public health and clinical practice, including its potential for early intervention and cross-cultural validation.

Methods

This commentary critically analyzes the findings of Tomida et al. (2024) and situates them within the broader literature on loneliness, disability, and aging. It also considers the multifactorial aspects of loneliness and disability in older adults.

Results

The UCLA-LS cutoff score of 44 serves as a practical benchmark for clinicians, which can be integrated into routine health assessments to identify individuals at risk. We underscore the need for additional research on cross-cultural validation and mechanisms linking loneliness to disability.

Conclusion

We advocate for incorporating social support measures into standard care for older adults to mitigate the effects of loneliness on disability. This letter suggests future research directions, including exploring the causal pathways between loneliness and disability and developing culturally appropriate interventions.

孤独是老年人残疾的预测因素:不同文化背景下加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表临界值的意义》(UCLA Loneliness Scale Cutoff Score Implications Across Cultural Contexts)。
背景:这封信回应了 Tomida 等人(2024 年)的研究,该研究验证了 UCLA 孤独量表(UCLA-LS)预测日本老年人残疾的最佳临界值。该研究确定了 44 分的临界值,为早期发现高危人群提供了一个重要指标:讨论所确定的临界值对公共卫生和临床实践的影响,包括其早期干预和跨文化验证的潜力:本评论对 Tomida 等人(2024 年)的研究结果进行了批判性分析,并将其置于有关孤独、残疾和老龄化的更广泛的文献中。它还考虑了老年人孤独和残疾的多因素方面:结果:UCLA-LS 的临界值 44 分可作为临床医生的实用基准,将其纳入常规健康评估以识别高危人群。我们强调需要对跨文化验证以及孤独与残疾的关联机制进行更多研究:我们主张将社会支持措施纳入老年人的标准护理中,以减轻孤独对残疾的影响。这封信提出了未来的研究方向,包括探索孤独与残疾之间的因果关系,以及开发适合不同文化的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信