Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær, Merete Storgaard, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
{"title":"Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for people living with HIV: Insights from patients and healthcare providers in a Danish outpatient clinic.","authors":"Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær, Merete Storgaard, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard","doi":"10.1111/hiv.13734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a valuable tool for aligning HIV care with patient needs and priorities. This study aimed to explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences of integrating a PRO solution into standard clinical care for HIV in a Danish outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A tailored PRO solution for people living with HIV was developed in a Danish outpatient clinic. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years, spoke Danish, had been on effective antiretroviral therapy for 2 years, and had no additional health issues. Patients completed an electronic questionnaire 14 days before in-clinic consultations. HCPs reviewed patients' responses before these consultations. We assessed the usability, acceptability, and relevance of the PRO solution by conducting semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (12 responders and 12 non-responders) and six HCPs. A further 95 non-responders were interviewed over the phone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents found that PROs improved patient-provider communication, treatment planning, and self-management. Non-respondents faced barriers such as health literacy, cultural beliefs, and access to technology, necessitating alternative delivery methods. HCPs found that PROs facilitated person-centred care and symptom management, but HCPs faced challenges such as insufficient training, resources, and organizational support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing PROs in HIV care is challenging because of the patient diversity, clinician training needs, and organizational adaptations. Nevertheless, the use of PROs is associated with enhanced person-centred care. Future recommendations include tailored use of PROs, better understanding of the impact on patient groups, on-site questionnaire completion, and emphasis on shared decision-making between patients and HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a valuable tool for aligning HIV care with patient needs and priorities. This study aimed to explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences of integrating a PRO solution into standard clinical care for HIV in a Danish outpatient clinic.
Methods: A tailored PRO solution for people living with HIV was developed in a Danish outpatient clinic. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years, spoke Danish, had been on effective antiretroviral therapy for 2 years, and had no additional health issues. Patients completed an electronic questionnaire 14 days before in-clinic consultations. HCPs reviewed patients' responses before these consultations. We assessed the usability, acceptability, and relevance of the PRO solution by conducting semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (12 responders and 12 non-responders) and six HCPs. A further 95 non-responders were interviewed over the phone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Respondents found that PROs improved patient-provider communication, treatment planning, and self-management. Non-respondents faced barriers such as health literacy, cultural beliefs, and access to technology, necessitating alternative delivery methods. HCPs found that PROs facilitated person-centred care and symptom management, but HCPs faced challenges such as insufficient training, resources, and organizational support.
Conclusions: Implementing PROs in HIV care is challenging because of the patient diversity, clinician training needs, and organizational adaptations. Nevertheless, the use of PROs is associated with enhanced person-centred care. Future recommendations include tailored use of PROs, better understanding of the impact on patient groups, on-site questionnaire completion, and emphasis on shared decision-making between patients and HCPs.
期刊介绍:
HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.