Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2024.2422918
Zhiqiang Liu, Hongzhan Zhang, Feng Xiong, Xin Huang, Shuyi Yu, Qing Sun, Lianghui Diao, Zhenjuan Li, Yulian Wu, Yong Zeng, Chunyu Huang
{"title":"Prediction of clinical pregnancy outcome after single fresh blastocyst transfer during in vitro fertilization: an ensemble learning perspective.","authors":"Zhiqiang Liu, Hongzhan Zhang, Feng Xiong, Xin Huang, Shuyi Yu, Qing Sun, Lianghui Diao, Zhenjuan Li, Yulian Wu, Yong Zeng, Chunyu Huang","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2024.2422918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To establish a predictive model for clinical pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of a single fresh blastocyst in vitro fertilization (IVF). 615 patients (492 in training set and 123 in test set) who underwent the first single and fresh blastocyst transfer in the first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle performed in fertility centre of Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital from July 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. Conventional method such as logistic regression (LR), individual machine learning methods including naive bayesian (NB), K-nearest neighbours (K-NN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble learning methods including random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, Voting were used to establish the clinical pregnancy outcome prediction model, and the efficacy among different models was compared. Three major types of prediction models, including conventional method: LR (AUC = 0.707), individual machine learning classifiers: NB (AUC = 0.741), K-NN (AUC = 0.719), SVM (AUC = 0.761), DT (AUC = 0.728), ensemble models: RF (AUC = 0.790), XGBoost (AUC = 0.799), LightGBM (AUC = 0.794), Voting (AUC = 0.845) were established. It was found that the performance of the voting model was best. This study revealed that a voting classifier can provide a more accurate estimate of IVF outcome, which can assist clinicians to make individual patient counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"27 1","pages":"2422918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2422918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To establish a predictive model for clinical pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of a single fresh blastocyst in vitro fertilization (IVF). 615 patients (492 in training set and 123 in test set) who underwent the first single and fresh blastocyst transfer in the first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle performed in fertility centre of Shenzhen Zhongshan Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital from July 2015 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. Conventional method such as logistic regression (LR), individual machine learning methods including naive bayesian (NB), K-nearest neighbours (K-NN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and ensemble learning methods including random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, Voting were used to establish the clinical pregnancy outcome prediction model, and the efficacy among different models was compared. Three major types of prediction models, including conventional method: LR (AUC = 0.707), individual machine learning classifiers: NB (AUC = 0.741), K-NN (AUC = 0.719), SVM (AUC = 0.761), DT (AUC = 0.728), ensemble models: RF (AUC = 0.790), XGBoost (AUC = 0.799), LightGBM (AUC = 0.794), Voting (AUC = 0.845) were established. It was found that the performance of the voting model was best. This study revealed that a voting classifier can provide a more accurate estimate of IVF outcome, which can assist clinicians to make individual patient counselling.

体外受精过程中单个新鲜囊胚移植后临床妊娠结果的预测:集合学习的视角。
建立体外受精(IVF)移植单个新鲜囊胚后临床妊娠结局的预测模型。本研究选取了 2015 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月期间在深圳中山妇产医院生殖中心进行首次体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中接受首次单个新鲜囊胚移植的 615 例患者(492 例为训练集,123 例为测试集)。采用逻辑回归(LR)等传统方法,天真贝叶斯(NB)、K-近邻(K-NN)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)等单个机器学习方法,以及随机森林(RF)、XGBoost、LightGBM、Voting等集合学习方法建立临床妊娠结局预测模型,并比较不同模型之间的有效性。三种主要的预测模型,包括传统方法:LR(AUC = 0.707)、单个机器学习分类器:NB(AUC = 0.741)、K-NN(AUC = 0.719)、SVM(AUC = 0.761)、DT(AUC = 0.728);集合模型:建立了 RF(AUC = 0.790)、XGBoost(AUC = 0.799)、LightGBM(AUC = 0.794)、Voting(AUC = 0.845)等集合模型。结果发现,投票模型的性能最好。这项研究表明,投票分类器可以更准确地估计试管婴儿的结果,从而帮助临床医生对患者进行个别辅导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信