Discrepancies between home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: analysis from the Korean resistant hypertension cohort.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jiwon Seo, Chan Joo Lee, Dae-Hee Kim, Song-Yi Kim, Jae Youn Moon, Jae-Hyeong Park, Jang-Won Son, Jang Young Kim, In-Cheol Kim, Moo-Yong Rhee, Ju-Hee Lee, Hae-Young Lee, Joong-Wha Chung, Sang-Hyun Ihm, Jung Hyun Choi, Jinho Shin, Sungha Park
{"title":"Discrepancies between home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: analysis from the Korean resistant hypertension cohort.","authors":"Jiwon Seo, Chan Joo Lee, Dae-Hee Kim, Song-Yi Kim, Jae Youn Moon, Jae-Hyeong Park, Jang-Won Son, Jang Young Kim, In-Cheol Kim, Moo-Yong Rhee, Ju-Hee Lee, Hae-Young Lee, Joong-Wha Chung, Sang-Hyun Ihm, Jung Hyun Choi, Jinho Shin, Sungha Park","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-02017-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRH) enrolled from 15 tertiary care centers in South Korea. aRH was defined as having uncontrolled office BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving three classes of antihypertensive medication or any level of BP despite receiving ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication. Patients with complete data for office BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and home BP measurements at baseline were included. BP control status between ABPM and home BP measurements was compared. Out of 1457 patients, 823 meeting the enrollment criteria were included (mean age: 59.9 ± 13.6 years; 57.5% male patients). Among them, 7.2% had controlled BP, 8.7% had whitecoat uncontrolled hypertension, 15.1% had masked uncontrolled hypertension, and 69% had sustained hypertension, as measured through baseline ABPM. Additionally, 43% of patients with controlled BP based on home BP measurement had nocturnal hypertension. Relying solely on home BP measurement may result in misclassifying 70% of patients as having either controlled BP or whitecoat uncontrolled BP. This study reaffirms the circadian pattern of resistant hypertension, characterized by a higher prevalence of non-dipping and rising patterns, even in patients with BP controlled based on ABPM. Considering the persistent difference between home BP measurement and ABPM, even at a lower home BP threshold, integrating both measurements into the management of aRH is advisable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-02017-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRH) enrolled from 15 tertiary care centers in South Korea. aRH was defined as having uncontrolled office BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving three classes of antihypertensive medication or any level of BP despite receiving ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication. Patients with complete data for office BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and home BP measurements at baseline were included. BP control status between ABPM and home BP measurements was compared. Out of 1457 patients, 823 meeting the enrollment criteria were included (mean age: 59.9 ± 13.6 years; 57.5% male patients). Among them, 7.2% had controlled BP, 8.7% had whitecoat uncontrolled hypertension, 15.1% had masked uncontrolled hypertension, and 69% had sustained hypertension, as measured through baseline ABPM. Additionally, 43% of patients with controlled BP based on home BP measurement had nocturnal hypertension. Relying solely on home BP measurement may result in misclassifying 70% of patients as having either controlled BP or whitecoat uncontrolled BP. This study reaffirms the circadian pattern of resistant hypertension, characterized by a higher prevalence of non-dipping and rising patterns, even in patients with BP controlled based on ABPM. Considering the persistent difference between home BP measurement and ABPM, even at a lower home BP threshold, integrating both measurements into the management of aRH is advisable.

明显耐药高血压患者家庭血压与门诊血压监测之间的差异:韩国耐药高血压队列分析。
本研究旨在调查韩国 15 家三级医疗中心收治的明显耐药高血压(aRH)患者诊室外血压(BP)测量的特点。aRH 的定义是:尽管接受了三种降压药物治疗,但诊室血压仍无法控制在 130/80 mmHg,或尽管接受了≥四种降压药物治疗,但血压仍处于任何水平。纳入的患者均在基线时拥有完整的诊室血压、24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM)和家庭血压测量数据。比较 ABPM 和家庭血压测量的血压控制状况。在 1457 名患者中,有 823 名符合入选标准(平均年龄:59.9 ± 13.6 岁;57.5% 为男性患者)。根据基线 ABPM 测量,其中 7.2% 的患者血压已得到控制,8.7% 的患者为白衣型未控制高血压,15.1% 的患者为掩蔽型未控制高血压,69% 的患者为持续性高血压。此外,在根据家庭血压测量结果控制血压的患者中,有 43% 患有夜间高血压。仅依靠家庭血压测量可能会导致 70% 的患者被误诊为血压控制或白衣血压失控。这项研究再次证实了抵抗性高血压的昼夜节律模式,其特点是即使是根据 ABPM 测量血压得到控制的患者,也有较高的非下降和上升模式。考虑到家庭血压测量与 ABPM 之间的持续差异,即使家庭血压阈值较低,也应将两种测量方法纳入抵抗性高血压的管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信