Challenges associated with access to recently developed hemophilia treatments in routine care: perspectives of healthcare professionals.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Karin Berger, Roxy H O'Rourke, Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno, Angelika Batorova, Kaan Kavakli, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Wolfgang Schramm, Rhonda L Bohn, Louis Aledort
{"title":"Challenges associated with access to recently developed hemophilia treatments in routine care: perspectives of healthcare professionals.","authors":"Karin Berger, Roxy H O'Rourke, Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno, Angelika Batorova, Kaan Kavakli, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Wolfgang Schramm, Rhonda L Bohn, Louis Aledort","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2024.285647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment landscape for haemophilia continues to rapidly develop, and expectations for future treatment success are high. There is limited information on the challenges to accessing new and innovative therapies. The aim of this study was to explore challenges with accessing haemophilia treatment from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs). A crosssectional study design was used. A pilot-tested, online survey was distributed to haemophilia treatment centres in Australia, Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Turkey, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The questionnaire covered questions on product access, economic considerations, health technology assessment requirements, and patient organization involvement. The results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS. A total of 154 HCPs completed the questionnaire. There was heterogeneity across countries, regions, and centres regarding HCPs' knowledge of access to novel recently developed treatments. Notable limitations to access were reported such as differences in access based on age of patient and type of product, economic considerations, and the growing influence of HTA bodies. Many countries have a hemophilia patient organization that does not have a vote at the decision-making table. There is a need to empower HCPs to better understand national healthcare structures and decisions that lead to access limitations. Requirements from HTA bodies must be understood to optimally design clinical studies and value generation of treatment options. This may strengthen the haemophilia treatment centre's voice to collectively mandate for exchange with key involved individuals, such as the payers and politicians for the provision of optimal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.285647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment landscape for haemophilia continues to rapidly develop, and expectations for future treatment success are high. There is limited information on the challenges to accessing new and innovative therapies. The aim of this study was to explore challenges with accessing haemophilia treatment from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs). A crosssectional study design was used. A pilot-tested, online survey was distributed to haemophilia treatment centres in Australia, Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Turkey, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The questionnaire covered questions on product access, economic considerations, health technology assessment requirements, and patient organization involvement. The results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS. A total of 154 HCPs completed the questionnaire. There was heterogeneity across countries, regions, and centres regarding HCPs' knowledge of access to novel recently developed treatments. Notable limitations to access were reported such as differences in access based on age of patient and type of product, economic considerations, and the growing influence of HTA bodies. Many countries have a hemophilia patient organization that does not have a vote at the decision-making table. There is a need to empower HCPs to better understand national healthcare structures and decisions that lead to access limitations. Requirements from HTA bodies must be understood to optimally design clinical studies and value generation of treatment options. This may strengthen the haemophilia treatment centre's voice to collectively mandate for exchange with key involved individuals, such as the payers and politicians for the provision of optimal therapy.

在常规护理中使用最近开发的血友病治疗方法所面临的挑战:医护人员的观点。
血友病的治疗领域在继续快速发展,人们对未来治疗的成功寄予厚望。但有关获得新的创新疗法所面临的挑战的信息却很有限。本研究旨在从医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的角度探讨获得血友病治疗所面临的挑战。研究采用横断面研究设计。我们向澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、意大利、新西兰、爱尔兰共和国、土耳其、美国和英国的血友病治疗中心发放了一份经过试点测试的在线调查问卷。调查问卷涉及产品使用、经济因素、卫生技术评估要求和患者组织参与等方面的问题。调查结果使用 SPSS 进行了描述性分析。共有 154 名卫生保健人员完成了问卷调查。不同国家、地区和中心的医疗保健人员对新近开发的新型疗法的了解程度不尽相同。据报告,在获取新药方面存在一些明显的限制,如根据患者年龄和产品类型、经济因素以及 HTA 机构日益增长的影响力而存在的获取差异。许多国家的血友病患者组织在决策层没有投票权。有必要增强初级保健人员的能力,让他们更好地了解国家医疗保健结构和导致使用限制的决策。必须了解 HTA 机构的要求,以优化临床研究的设计和治疗方案的价值生成。这可以加强血友病治疗中心的发言权,以便集体授权与支付方和政治家等主要相关人员进行交流,提供最佳治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信