Association between focal amyloid deposition and cognitive impairment in individuals below the amyloid threshold.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1452081
Hongki Ham, Byeong C Kim, Eun Hye Lee, Daeun Shin, Hyemin Jang, Sung Hoon Kang, Jihwan Yun, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Soo Hyun Cho
{"title":"Association between focal amyloid deposition and cognitive impairment in individuals below the amyloid threshold.","authors":"Hongki Ham, Byeong C Kim, Eun Hye Lee, Daeun Shin, Hyemin Jang, Sung Hoon Kang, Jihwan Yun, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Jun Pyo Kim, Sang Won Seo, Soo Hyun Cho","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1452081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of individuals with amyloid levels below the threshold. To achieve this, we differentiated between two groups: those with global amyloid negativity but focal deposition [G(-)F(+)] and those without focal deposition [G(-)F(-)].</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 2,677 participants were diagnosed with cognitive unimpairment (CU) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MRI-based regional centiloid (CL) values were used to establish threshold values for each brain region. After applying a cutoff of 20 rdcCL to identify amyloid positivity, participants who were globally amyloid-negative were grouped into three categories: those who showed focal amyloid uptake [G(-)F(+)], individuals without focal amyloid deposition but with relatively high CL(HC) levels comparable to those in the focal uptake group [G(-)F(-) HC)], and those with relatively low CL(LC) levels [G(-)F(-) LC]. We compared the neuropsychological test results and brain structural changes between these groups using ANCOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The G(-)F(+) group demonstrated a lower cortical thickness (<i>P</i> < 0.001) than the G(-)F(-) HC group. In neuropsychological tests, the G(-)F(+) group exhibited lower the Seoul Verbal Learning Test delayed recall (SVLT-DR) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and showed progressed clinical status in the clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SOB) compared to the G(-)F(-) HC group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The subsequent sensitivity analyses confirmed the persistence of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with focal amyloid deposition [G(-)F(+)] exhibited higher rates of cognitive impairment compared to patients with similar levels of amyloid, underscoring the importance of monitoring the progression of focal uptake, even when it remains below the amyloid threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"16 ","pages":"1452081"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1452081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of individuals with amyloid levels below the threshold. To achieve this, we differentiated between two groups: those with global amyloid negativity but focal deposition [G(-)F(+)] and those without focal deposition [G(-)F(-)].

Materials and methods: A total of 2,677 participants were diagnosed with cognitive unimpairment (CU) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MRI-based regional centiloid (CL) values were used to establish threshold values for each brain region. After applying a cutoff of 20 rdcCL to identify amyloid positivity, participants who were globally amyloid-negative were grouped into three categories: those who showed focal amyloid uptake [G(-)F(+)], individuals without focal amyloid deposition but with relatively high CL(HC) levels comparable to those in the focal uptake group [G(-)F(-) HC)], and those with relatively low CL(LC) levels [G(-)F(-) LC]. We compared the neuropsychological test results and brain structural changes between these groups using ANCOVA.

Results: The G(-)F(+) group demonstrated a lower cortical thickness (P < 0.001) than the G(-)F(-) HC group. In neuropsychological tests, the G(-)F(+) group exhibited lower the Seoul Verbal Learning Test delayed recall (SVLT-DR) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and showed progressed clinical status in the clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SOB) compared to the G(-)F(-) HC group (P < 0.001). The subsequent sensitivity analyses confirmed the persistence of these findings.

Conclusions: Individuals with focal amyloid deposition [G(-)F(+)] exhibited higher rates of cognitive impairment compared to patients with similar levels of amyloid, underscoring the importance of monitoring the progression of focal uptake, even when it remains below the amyloid threshold.

低于淀粉样蛋白阈值的人的局灶性淀粉样蛋白沉积与认知障碍之间的关系。
目的:本研究旨在调查淀粉样蛋白水平低于阈值的个体的特征。为此,我们区分了两类人群:淀粉样蛋白整体阴性但有局灶性沉积的人群[G(-)F(+)]和无局灶性沉积的人群[G(-)F(-)]:共有2,677名参与者被诊断为认知功能未受损(CU)或轻度认知功能受损(MCI)。采用基于磁共振成像的区域颅磁(CL)值来确定每个脑区的阈值。以 20 rdcCL 为临界值来确定淀粉样蛋白阳性,然后将总体淀粉样蛋白阴性的参与者分为三类:显示局灶性淀粉样蛋白摄取的参与者[G(-)F(+)]、无局灶性淀粉样蛋白沉积但 CL(HC) 水平相对较高且与局灶性摄取组相当的个体[G(-)F(-) HC],以及 CL(LC) 水平相对较低的个体[G(-)F(-) LC]。我们使用方差分析比较了这两组之间的神经心理测试结果和大脑结构变化:结果:与 G(-)F(-) HC 组相比,G(-)F(+) 组的皮质厚度较低(P < 0.001)。在神经心理学测试中,与 G(-)F(-) HC 组相比,G(-)F(+) 组的首尔言语学习测试延迟回忆(SVLT-DR)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)得分较低,临床痴呆评级-方框总和(CDR-SOB)显示临床状态有所进展(P < 0.001)。随后的敏感性分析证实了这些结果的持续性:结论:与淀粉样蛋白水平相似的患者相比,局灶性淀粉样蛋白沉积[G(-)F(+)]患者表现出更高的认知损伤率,这强调了监测局灶性摄取进展的重要性,即使摄取量仍低于淀粉样蛋白阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信