Digital vs formal teaching of vaginal breech delivery: Which is the residents’ choice?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Giovanna Salvani , Barbara Matarrelli , Federico Prefumo , Maurizio Rosati , Claudio Meloni , Claudio Celentano
{"title":"Digital vs formal teaching of vaginal breech delivery: Which is the residents’ choice?","authors":"Giovanna Salvani ,&nbsp;Barbara Matarrelli ,&nbsp;Federico Prefumo ,&nbsp;Maurizio Rosati ,&nbsp;Claudio Meloni ,&nbsp;Claudio Celentano","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><div>A critical area of obstetrics that demands proficient training is the management of breech deliveries. There was a notable decline in the number of vaginal breech deliveries in the following years, establishing CS as the preferred method of delivery for such cases. Cohort studies using targeted screening and skilled practitioners demonstrated little differences between the two delivery. Skills acquisition at the patient’s bedside is very difficult to obtain, particularly in the youngest trainees. Simulation teaching has largely become a part of the training curricula for many obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study. Residents were randomly assigned in two groups with similar characteristics. Group A attended a formal lecture. Group B received the study material and recording of the lecture as digital home learning. Lecture and simulation focused on vaginal breech delivery. After one month both groups underwent a simulation test addressed to assist a vaginal breech birth. Four supervisors evaluated all videos. Time needed for birth, and evaluation scales as Objective Structured Clinical Examination were recorded. A questionnaire was completed online using Google Forms with 6 questions. The primary outcome was to compare the evaluation for each item and globally within groups. A secondary outcome was the evaluation of questionnaire results within the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-two participants were recruited and randomized. None of the participants withdrew from the study. For the primary outcome, all examined variables (Time, Rumping, Legs, Body, Arms, Head, Total Point) did not present differences in supervisors’ evaluations. For the secondary outcome, Group B showed higher values in two questions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>The major finding of our study is that digital learning and formal lecture presented similar results on resident knowledge. Teaching programs involving mannequin simulation − both high and low fidelity − are reproducible and efficient for skill retain in obstetric emergencies, particularly in low incidence emergencies. The main limitation of our study was the small sample size. In addition, it is possible that a scenario without deviation or a lecture more focused on possible deviation from normal could modify residents’ results facing breech delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 345-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s)

A critical area of obstetrics that demands proficient training is the management of breech deliveries. There was a notable decline in the number of vaginal breech deliveries in the following years, establishing CS as the preferred method of delivery for such cases. Cohort studies using targeted screening and skilled practitioners demonstrated little differences between the two delivery. Skills acquisition at the patient’s bedside is very difficult to obtain, particularly in the youngest trainees. Simulation teaching has largely become a part of the training curricula for many obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.

Study design

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study. Residents were randomly assigned in two groups with similar characteristics. Group A attended a formal lecture. Group B received the study material and recording of the lecture as digital home learning. Lecture and simulation focused on vaginal breech delivery. After one month both groups underwent a simulation test addressed to assist a vaginal breech birth. Four supervisors evaluated all videos. Time needed for birth, and evaluation scales as Objective Structured Clinical Examination were recorded. A questionnaire was completed online using Google Forms with 6 questions. The primary outcome was to compare the evaluation for each item and globally within groups. A secondary outcome was the evaluation of questionnaire results within the two groups.

Results

Thirty-two participants were recruited and randomized. None of the participants withdrew from the study. For the primary outcome, all examined variables (Time, Rumping, Legs, Body, Arms, Head, Total Point) did not present differences in supervisors’ evaluations. For the secondary outcome, Group B showed higher values in two questions.

Conclusion(s)

The major finding of our study is that digital learning and formal lecture presented similar results on resident knowledge. Teaching programs involving mannequin simulation − both high and low fidelity − are reproducible and efficient for skill retain in obstetric emergencies, particularly in low incidence emergencies. The main limitation of our study was the small sample size. In addition, it is possible that a scenario without deviation or a lecture more focused on possible deviation from normal could modify residents’ results facing breech delivery.
阴道臀位分娩的数字化教学与正规教学:住院医师的选择是什么?
目的:臀位分娩是产科的一个关键领域,需要熟练的培训。在随后的几年中,阴道臀位分娩的数量明显下降,CS 成为此类情况下的首选分娩方式。使用定向筛查和熟练从业人员进行的队列研究表明,两种分娩方式之间的差异很小。在患者床旁掌握技能非常困难,尤其是对最年轻的学员而言。模拟教学在很大程度上已成为许多妇产科住院医师培训课程的一部分:研究设计:这是一项前瞻性、随机对照、单中心研究。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性、随机对照、单中心研究。住院医师被随机分配到两个具有相似特征的小组。A 组参加正式讲座。B 组接受学习材料和讲座录音,作为数字家庭学习内容。讲座和模拟的重点是阴道臀位分娩。一个月后,两组都进行了模拟测试,测试内容为阴道臀位助产。四名监督员对所有视频进行了评估。记录了分娩所需的时间和客观结构化临床检查的评价量表。使用谷歌表格在线填写了一份包含 6 个问题的调查问卷。主要结果是比较各组内对每个项目和全球的评价。次要结果是对两组内的问卷结果进行评估:共招募并随机分配了 32 名参与者。没有人退出研究。在主要结果方面,所有研究变量(时间、驼背、腿部、身体、手臂、头部、总分)在监督员的评价中均无差异。在次要结果中,B 组在两个问题上的数值较高:我们研究的主要发现是,数字化学习和正规讲座对住院医师知识的影响结果相似。涉及高保真和低保真人体模型模拟的教学项目对于保持产科急诊技能,尤其是低发生率急诊技能,具有可重复性和高效性。我们研究的主要局限性在于样本量较小。此外,没有偏差的情景或更注重可能偏离正常情况的讲座可能会改变住院医师面对臀位分娩的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信