Morbidity-free survival in extremely premature infants after changes of clinical practices according to evidence-based guidelines: a quality improvement uncontrolled before-after study in a neonatal intensive care unit.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Vanessa Bissainte-Zelbin, Amélie Durandy, Ludivine Lecoq, Pierre-Yves Wachter, Ouafa Bennour, Felix Micklethwait, Pascal Boileau, Emmanuelle Motte-Signoret
{"title":"Morbidity-free survival in extremely premature infants after changes of clinical practices according to evidence-based guidelines: a quality improvement uncontrolled before-after study in a neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"Vanessa Bissainte-Zelbin, Amélie Durandy, Ludivine Lecoq, Pierre-Yves Wachter, Ouafa Bennour, Felix Micklethwait, Pascal Boileau, Emmanuelle Motte-Signoret","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Four indicators of severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) (intraventricular hemorrhage stages 3-4, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage 3, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and/or necrotizing enterocolitis) are well-known to be associated with poor infancy outcome after very preterm birth. Practice changes according to recent guidelines were implemented after medical team restructuration. We hypothesized that these changes may have improved overall survival and SNM-free survival in extremely preterm infants (EPI). We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, uncontrolled before-after study at our neonatal intensive care unit including all inborn alive neonates with gestational age less than 28 weeks during two periods (period 1 2016-2017, period 2 2019-2020). We compared the global and SNM-free survival rates before and after changes were implemented. Clinical, ventilatory, and nutritional data were also collected for comparison. We included 163 EPI (76 for period 1, 87 for period 2). Twenty-five patients deceased before home discharge in each group. The median duration of invasive ventilation was shorter during period 2 (4 vs 17 days, p < 0.01). Patients of period 2 had an earlier exclusive enteral nutrition (20 vs 34 days, p < 0.01). The composite endpoint of \"death or SNM\" was lower during period 2 (40.2% vs 55.3%, p = 0.06). Neonates of period 2 were more frequently free of any SNM indicators (83.9% vs 66.7%, p = 0.03). ROP and nosocomial infections were less frequent during period 2 (3.2% vs 21.7%, p < 0.005 and 37.1% vs 62.7%, p = 0.006; respectively). We also observed lower rates of moderate and severe BPD during period 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolution of our clinical practices appears to have positive effects on global and SNM-free survival and seems to have reduced the incidence of nosocomial infections.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Using global survival and severe neonatal morbidity-free survival rates allows to compare inter- and intra-team critical care practices in neonatal intensive care units. • Major changes in clinical procedures, in accordance to recent guidelines, were implemented after the restructuration of the medical team in 2018, with the expected objective of improving morbidity and mortality of extremely premature infants (EPI) in our unit.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• After the changes, EPI exhibit a lower composite endpoint of \"death or severe neonatal morbidity (SNM)\" and were more frequently free of any SNM indicators concomitantly with a shorter median duration of invasive ventilation and parenteral nutrition. • The evolution of local clinical practices may positively impact mortality and morbidity within a few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05842-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four indicators of severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) (intraventricular hemorrhage stages 3-4, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage 3, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and/or necrotizing enterocolitis) are well-known to be associated with poor infancy outcome after very preterm birth. Practice changes according to recent guidelines were implemented after medical team restructuration. We hypothesized that these changes may have improved overall survival and SNM-free survival in extremely preterm infants (EPI). We conducted a monocentric, retrospective, uncontrolled before-after study at our neonatal intensive care unit including all inborn alive neonates with gestational age less than 28 weeks during two periods (period 1 2016-2017, period 2 2019-2020). We compared the global and SNM-free survival rates before and after changes were implemented. Clinical, ventilatory, and nutritional data were also collected for comparison. We included 163 EPI (76 for period 1, 87 for period 2). Twenty-five patients deceased before home discharge in each group. The median duration of invasive ventilation was shorter during period 2 (4 vs 17 days, p < 0.01). Patients of period 2 had an earlier exclusive enteral nutrition (20 vs 34 days, p < 0.01). The composite endpoint of "death or SNM" was lower during period 2 (40.2% vs 55.3%, p = 0.06). Neonates of period 2 were more frequently free of any SNM indicators (83.9% vs 66.7%, p = 0.03). ROP and nosocomial infections were less frequent during period 2 (3.2% vs 21.7%, p < 0.005 and 37.1% vs 62.7%, p = 0.006; respectively). We also observed lower rates of moderate and severe BPD during period 2.

Conclusion: The evolution of our clinical practices appears to have positive effects on global and SNM-free survival and seems to have reduced the incidence of nosocomial infections.

What is known: • Using global survival and severe neonatal morbidity-free survival rates allows to compare inter- and intra-team critical care practices in neonatal intensive care units. • Major changes in clinical procedures, in accordance to recent guidelines, were implemented after the restructuration of the medical team in 2018, with the expected objective of improving morbidity and mortality of extremely premature infants (EPI) in our unit.

What is new: • After the changes, EPI exhibit a lower composite endpoint of "death or severe neonatal morbidity (SNM)" and were more frequently free of any SNM indicators concomitantly with a shorter median duration of invasive ventilation and parenteral nutrition. • The evolution of local clinical practices may positively impact mortality and morbidity within a few years.

根据循证指南改变临床实践后极度早产儿的无发病存活率:新生儿重症监护病房质量改进前后对照研究。
众所周知,新生儿严重发病率(SNM)的四个指标(脑室内出血 3-4 期、早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)3 期、严重支气管肺发育不良(BPD)和/或坏死性小肠结肠炎)与极早产后婴儿期的不良预后有关。医疗团队重组后,根据最新的指南对实践进行了调整。我们假设这些改变可能会提高极早产儿(EPI)的总体存活率和无 SNM 存活率。我们在新生儿重症监护室进行了一项单中心、回顾性、无对照的前后研究,包括两个时期(时期 1 2016-2017,时期 2 2019-2020)胎龄小于 28 周的所有活产新生儿。我们比较了实施变革前后的总体存活率和无 SNM 存活率。我们还收集了临床、呼吸和营养数据,以进行比较。我们纳入了 163 名 EPI(第一期 76 人,第二期 87 人)。每组均有 25 名患者在出院前死亡。第 2 阶段有创通气的中位持续时间较短(4 天 vs 17 天,P 结论:第 2 阶段有创通气的中位持续时间较短,P 结论:第 2 阶段有创通气的中位持续时间较长:我们临床实践的演变似乎对总体存活率和无 SNM 存活率产生了积极影响,并似乎降低了院内感染的发生率:- 使用总存活率和无新生儿重症发病率存活率可以比较新生儿重症监护病房团队间和团队内的重症监护措施。- 2018年医疗团队重组后,根据最新指南对临床程序进行了重大调整,预期目标是改善本单位极早产儿(EPI)的发病率和死亡率:- 改革后,极早产儿的 "死亡或新生儿严重发病(SNM)"综合终点更低,更常无任何 SNM 指标,同时有创通气和肠外营养的中位持续时间更短。- 当地临床实践的发展可能会在几年内对死亡率和发病率产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信