Early Detection of Psychosis in Eating Disorders: Unnecessary or a Useful Addition?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Paul A J M de Bont, Birgit Seelen-de Lang, Joyce Maas, Nynke M G Bodde
{"title":"Early Detection of Psychosis in Eating Disorders: Unnecessary or a Useful Addition?","authors":"Paul A J M de Bont, Birgit Seelen-de Lang, Joyce Maas, Nynke M G Bodde","doi":"10.1111/eip.13630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The absence of consensus regarding the presence and interpretation of certain symptoms as indicative of either a psychosis spectrum disorder or an eating disorder (ED) can hinder cooperation amongst treatment programmes for the early detection of psychosis and an ED. This study trans-diagnostically assessed the prevalence and co-occurrence of at-risk mental states for a psychosis (ARMS) or the risk of having an ED (EDr), and it explored the characteristics of ARMS profiles of individuals with an EDr.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional and observational-prevalence study used assessment outcomes from an ED screening instrument (SCOFF), a psychosis prodromal screening questionnaire (PQ16) and a CAARMS interview (to evaluate the possibility of ARMS) with newly admitted outpatients aged 16-35 who were referred for various kinds of non-psychotic disorders from a secondary Mental Health Care Centre in the Netherlands. Data analysis consisted of calculating prevalences, associations amongst variables and conditional probabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 736 individuals who were screened, an EDr was identified in 51.2% and 49.0% of the participants who scored high on the PQ16, half of whom also completed the CAARMS interview. The results indicated that 53.0% of the participants were classified as not having ARMS, 28.3% as having ARMS and 18.7% as having a psychosis. EDr patients presented with symptoms of a psychotic spectrum disorder, which included both ED-consistent and ED-inconsistent symptoms. There were relatively frequent endorsements of the two subscale items guilt/punishment and ideas of reference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From a trans-diagnostical perspective, the results indicate that collaboration amongst ED programmes and psychosis prevention interventions should be strongly encouraged. Future researchers are encouraged to conduct studies that assess associations amongst and features of psychotic spectrum symptoms in EDs. The unexpectedly high proportion of EDr suggests that a co-morbid ED in other kinds of psychopathology is being overlooked.</p>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The absence of consensus regarding the presence and interpretation of certain symptoms as indicative of either a psychosis spectrum disorder or an eating disorder (ED) can hinder cooperation amongst treatment programmes for the early detection of psychosis and an ED. This study trans-diagnostically assessed the prevalence and co-occurrence of at-risk mental states for a psychosis (ARMS) or the risk of having an ED (EDr), and it explored the characteristics of ARMS profiles of individuals with an EDr.

Method: This cross-sectional and observational-prevalence study used assessment outcomes from an ED screening instrument (SCOFF), a psychosis prodromal screening questionnaire (PQ16) and a CAARMS interview (to evaluate the possibility of ARMS) with newly admitted outpatients aged 16-35 who were referred for various kinds of non-psychotic disorders from a secondary Mental Health Care Centre in the Netherlands. Data analysis consisted of calculating prevalences, associations amongst variables and conditional probabilities.

Results: Of the 736 individuals who were screened, an EDr was identified in 51.2% and 49.0% of the participants who scored high on the PQ16, half of whom also completed the CAARMS interview. The results indicated that 53.0% of the participants were classified as not having ARMS, 28.3% as having ARMS and 18.7% as having a psychosis. EDr patients presented with symptoms of a psychotic spectrum disorder, which included both ED-consistent and ED-inconsistent symptoms. There were relatively frequent endorsements of the two subscale items guilt/punishment and ideas of reference.

Conclusions: From a trans-diagnostical perspective, the results indicate that collaboration amongst ED programmes and psychosis prevention interventions should be strongly encouraged. Future researchers are encouraged to conduct studies that assess associations amongst and features of psychotic spectrum symptoms in EDs. The unexpectedly high proportion of EDr suggests that a co-morbid ED in other kinds of psychopathology is being overlooked.

饮食失调症患者精神病的早期检测:不必要还是有益的补充?
目的:对于是否存在某些症状以及如何解释这些症状才是精神病谱系障碍或进食障碍(ED)的征兆,目前还没有达成共识,这可能会阻碍各治疗项目之间在早期发现精神病和进食障碍方面的合作。本研究对精神病高危精神状态(ARMS)或进食障碍(EDr)的患病率和并发率进行了转诊断评估,并探讨了进食障碍患者的ARMS特征:这项横断面观察流行率研究使用了 ED 筛查工具(SCOFF)、精神病前兆筛查问卷(PQ16)和 CAARMS 访谈(用于评估 ARMS 的可能性)的评估结果,研究对象是荷兰一家二级精神卫生保健中心转诊的各种非精神病性障碍的 16-35 岁新入院门诊患者。数据分析包括计算患病率、变量之间的关联和条件概率:在接受筛查的 736 人中,51.2% 的人被确定患有 EDr,49.0% 的人在 PQ16 中得分较高,其中一半人还完成了 CAARMS 访谈。结果显示,53.0%的参与者被归类为未患有 ARMS,28.3%患有 ARMS,18.7%患有精神病。EDr 患者表现出精神病谱系障碍的症状,其中包括与 ED 一致的症状和与 ED 不一致的症状。内疚/惩罚和参照观念这两个分量表项目的出现频率相对较高:从跨诊断的角度来看,研究结果表明应大力鼓励 ED 计划和精神病预防干预措施之间的合作。鼓励未来的研究人员开展研究,评估 ED 中精神病谱系症状之间的关联和特征。EDr的比例出乎意料地高,这表明在其他类型的精神病理学中同时存在的ED被忽视了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信