Predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Boryeong Jeong, Subin Heo, Seung Soo Lee, Seon-Ok Kim, Yong Moon Shin, Kang Mo Kim, Tae-Yong Ha, Dong-Hwan Jung
{"title":"Predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.","authors":"Boryeong Jeong, Subin Heo, Seung Soo Lee, Seon-Ok Kim, Yong Moon Shin, Kang Mo Kim, Tae-Yong Ha, Dong-Hwan Jung","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11173-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop nomograms for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using deep learning analysis of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary (HBP) MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy for HCC between 2016 and 2020 at two referral centers. Using a deep learning algorithm, volumes and signal intensities of whole non-tumor liver, expected remnant liver, and spleen were measured on HBP images. Two multivariable logistic regression models were formulated to predict PHLF, defined and graded by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery: one based on whole non-tumor liver measurements (whole liver model) and the other on expected remnant liver measurements (remnant liver model). The models were presented as nomograms and a web-based calculator. Discrimination performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), with internal validation through 1000-fold bootstrapping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1760 patients (1395 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 60 ± 10 years), with 137 (7.8%) developing PHLF. Nomogram predictors included sex, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, prothrombin time international normalized ratio, platelets, extent of liver resection, and MRI variables derived from the liver volume, liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio, and spleen volume. The whole liver and the remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively) and symptomatic (grades B and C) PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.81 and 0.84, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP images accurately stratify the risk of PHLF.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Can PHLF be predicted by integrating clinical and MRI-derived volume and functional variables through deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI? Findings Whole liver and remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF with the optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. Clinical relevance These nomograms can effectively stratify the risk of PHLF, providing a valuable tool for treatment decisions regarding hepatectomy for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11173-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop nomograms for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using deep learning analysis of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary (HBP) MRI.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy for HCC between 2016 and 2020 at two referral centers. Using a deep learning algorithm, volumes and signal intensities of whole non-tumor liver, expected remnant liver, and spleen were measured on HBP images. Two multivariable logistic regression models were formulated to predict PHLF, defined and graded by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery: one based on whole non-tumor liver measurements (whole liver model) and the other on expected remnant liver measurements (remnant liver model). The models were presented as nomograms and a web-based calculator. Discrimination performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), with internal validation through 1000-fold bootstrapping.

Results: The study included 1760 patients (1395 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 60 ± 10 years), with 137 (7.8%) developing PHLF. Nomogram predictors included sex, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, prothrombin time international normalized ratio, platelets, extent of liver resection, and MRI variables derived from the liver volume, liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio, and spleen volume. The whole liver and the remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively) and symptomatic (grades B and C) PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.81 and 0.84, respectively).

Conclusion: Nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP images accurately stratify the risk of PHLF.

Key points: Question Can PHLF be predicted by integrating clinical and MRI-derived volume and functional variables through deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI? Findings Whole liver and remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF with the optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. Clinical relevance These nomograms can effectively stratify the risk of PHLF, providing a valuable tool for treatment decisions regarding hepatectomy for HCC.

预测肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭:基于钆醋酸增强磁共振成像深度学习分析的提名图。
研究目的本研究旨在利用对钆醋酸增强肝胆(HBP)MRI的深度学习分析,开发预测肝细胞癌(HCC)患者肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)的提名图:这项回顾性研究分析了2016年至2020年间在两个转诊中心接受钆醋酸增强MRI和肝切除术治疗HCC的患者。利用深度学习算法,在 HBP 图像上测量了整个非肿瘤肝脏、预期残肝和脾脏的体积和信号强度。根据国际肝脏外科研究小组(International Study Group of Liver Surgery)的定义和分级,制定了两个多变量逻辑回归模型来预测 PHLF:一个基于整个非肿瘤肝脏测量值(全肝模型),另一个基于预期残肝测量值(残肝模型)。这些模型以提名图和网络计算器的形式呈现。使用接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)评估辨别性能,并通过1000倍自引导进行内部验证:研究共纳入 1760 名患者(1395 名男性;平均年龄(标准差)为 60 ± 10 岁),其中 137 人(7.8%)罹患 PHLF。提名图预测因素包括性别、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶、凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值、血小板、肝切除范围以及由肝脏体积、肝脾信号强度比和脾脏体积得出的磁共振成像变量。全肝和残肝提名图对PHLF(乐观校正AUC分别为0.78和0.81)和无症状(B级和C级)PHLF(乐观校正AUC分别为0.81和0.84)具有很强的预测能力:结论:基于对钆醋酸增强的HBP图像进行深度学习分析的提名图能准确地对PHLF的风险进行分层:问题 通过对钆醋酸增强核磁共振成像进行深度学习分析,整合临床和核磁共振成像衍生的体积和功能变量,能否预测 PHLF?研究结果 全肝和残肝提名图对 PHLF 有很强的预测能力,乐观校正曲线下面积分别为 0.78 和 0.81。临床意义 这些提名图能有效地对 PHLF 的风险进行分层,为 HCC 的肝切除治疗决策提供有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信