M Joseph John, Jeff Stonebraker, Aikaj Jindal, Ellia Tootoonchian, Glenn P Pierce, Emna Gouider, Arihant Jain, Donna Coffin
{"title":"Global prophylaxis trends in hemophilia: a macroeconomic analysis and its association with world development indicators.","authors":"M Joseph John, Jeff Stonebraker, Aikaj Jindal, Ellia Tootoonchian, Glenn P Pierce, Emna Gouider, Arihant Jain, Donna Coffin","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2429606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prophylaxis is the recommended management strategy for all persons with hemophilia (PwH), yet its adoption is uneven worldwide.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This analysis examines global disparities in hemophilia care, focusing on global prophylactic coverage and its correlation with the World Bank's world development indicators. It outlines the disproportionate consumption of clotting factors and non-factor concentrates in high-income countries compared to lower-income counterparts and the challenges of expanding prophylaxis coverage in under-resourced settings. The analysis integrates socioeconomic data with global health indicators to understand these disparities and advocates for increased distribution of treatment resources across all income levels, emphasizing the need for policy changes to improve hemophilia care worldwide. Studies addressing the prophylaxis perspectives in hemophilia were selected using PubMed and Google Scholar platforms (unlimited time frame). Articles were supplemented with WFH's annual surveys and guidelines, including the WFH Global Survey 2022, WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia 2020 and World Bank data.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Significant disparities in hemophilia care and factor usage exist between high-income and lower-income countries. Standardized, harmonized metrics for different types of factor consumption are critical to accurately assess and compare hemophilia care on an international basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2429606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Prophylaxis is the recommended management strategy for all persons with hemophilia (PwH), yet its adoption is uneven worldwide.
Areas covered: This analysis examines global disparities in hemophilia care, focusing on global prophylactic coverage and its correlation with the World Bank's world development indicators. It outlines the disproportionate consumption of clotting factors and non-factor concentrates in high-income countries compared to lower-income counterparts and the challenges of expanding prophylaxis coverage in under-resourced settings. The analysis integrates socioeconomic data with global health indicators to understand these disparities and advocates for increased distribution of treatment resources across all income levels, emphasizing the need for policy changes to improve hemophilia care worldwide. Studies addressing the prophylaxis perspectives in hemophilia were selected using PubMed and Google Scholar platforms (unlimited time frame). Articles were supplemented with WFH's annual surveys and guidelines, including the WFH Global Survey 2022, WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia 2020 and World Bank data.
Expert opinion: Significant disparities in hemophilia care and factor usage exist between high-income and lower-income countries. Standardized, harmonized metrics for different types of factor consumption are critical to accurately assess and compare hemophilia care on an international basis.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.