Evaluation of a Vendor-Agnostic Deep Learning Model for Noise Reduction and Image Quality Improvement in Dental CBCT.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wojciech Kazimierczak, Róża Wajer, Oskar Komisarek, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, Adrian Wajer, Natalia Kazimierczak, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska, Zbigniew Serafin
{"title":"Evaluation of a Vendor-Agnostic Deep Learning Model for Noise Reduction and Image Quality Improvement in Dental CBCT.","authors":"Wojciech Kazimierczak, Róża Wajer, Oskar Komisarek, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, Adrian Wajer, Natalia Kazimierczak, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska, Zbigniew Serafin","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM) on image quality parameters and noise reduction in dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted on CBCT scans of 93 patients (41 males and 52 females, mean age 41.2 years, SD 15.8 years) from a single center using the inclusion criteria of standard radiation dose protocol images. Objective and subjective image quality was assessed in three predefined landmarks through contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements and visual assessment using a 5-point scale by three experienced readers. The inter-reader reliability and repeatability were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients (30 males and 50 females; mean age 41.5 years, SD 15.94 years) were included in this study. The CNR in DLM reconstructions was significantly greater than in native reconstructions, and the mean CNR in regions of interest 1-3 (ROI1-3) in DLM images was 11.12 ± 9.29, while in the case of native reconstructions, it was 7.64 ± 4.33 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The noise level in native reconstructions was significantly higher than in the DLM reconstructions, and the mean noise level in ROI1-3 in native images was 45.83 ± 25.89, while in the case of DLM reconstructions, it was 35.61 ± 24.28 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Subjective image quality assessment revealed no statistically significant differences between native and DLM reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms for CBCT imaging of the oral cavity can improve image quality by enhancing the CNR and lowering the noise.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: To assess the impact of a vendor-agnostic deep learning model (DLM) on image quality parameters and noise reduction in dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructions.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on CBCT scans of 93 patients (41 males and 52 females, mean age 41.2 years, SD 15.8 years) from a single center using the inclusion criteria of standard radiation dose protocol images. Objective and subjective image quality was assessed in three predefined landmarks through contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements and visual assessment using a 5-point scale by three experienced readers. The inter-reader reliability and repeatability were calculated.

Results: Eighty patients (30 males and 50 females; mean age 41.5 years, SD 15.94 years) were included in this study. The CNR in DLM reconstructions was significantly greater than in native reconstructions, and the mean CNR in regions of interest 1-3 (ROI1-3) in DLM images was 11.12 ± 9.29, while in the case of native reconstructions, it was 7.64 ± 4.33 (p < 0.001). The noise level in native reconstructions was significantly higher than in the DLM reconstructions, and the mean noise level in ROI1-3 in native images was 45.83 ± 25.89, while in the case of DLM reconstructions, it was 35.61 ± 24.28 (p < 0.05). Subjective image quality assessment revealed no statistically significant differences between native and DLM reconstructions.

Conclusions: The use of deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms for CBCT imaging of the oral cavity can improve image quality by enhancing the CNR and lowering the noise.

评估用于牙科 CBCT 降噪和提高图像质量的厂商诊断深度学习模型。
背景/目标:评估与供应商无关的深度学习模型(DLM)对牙科锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)重建中图像质量参数和降噪的影响:这项回顾性研究以标准辐射剂量协议图像为纳入标准,对来自一个中心的 93 名患者(男性 41 人,女性 52 人,平均年龄 41.2 岁,SD 15.8 岁)的 CBCT 扫描进行了研究。三位经验丰富的阅片师通过对比度-噪声比(CNR)测量和 5 分制视觉评估,对三个预定义地标进行了客观和主观图像质量评估。结果:本研究共纳入 80 名患者(男性 30 人,女性 50 人;平均年龄 41.5 岁,标差 15.94 岁)。DLM 重建的 CNR 明显高于原生重建,DLM 图像中 1-3 感兴趣区域(ROI1-3)的平均 CNR 为 11.12 ± 9.29,而原生重建的 CNR 为 7.64 ± 4.33(P < 0.001)。本机重建的噪声水平明显高于 DLM 重建,本机图像 ROI1-3 的平均噪声水平为 45.83 ± 25.89,而 DLM 重建的平均噪声水平为 35.61 ± 24.28(p < 0.05)。主观图像质量评估显示,原始图像和 DLM 重建之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异:结论:在口腔 CBCT 成像中使用基于深度学习的图像重建算法可通过提高 CNR 和降低噪声来改善图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信