Spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Taiki Hoshino, Takeshi Yoshida
{"title":"Spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients.","authors":"Taiki Hoshino, Takeshi Yoshida","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recent experimental and clinical studies have suggested that spontaneous effort can potentially injure the lungs. This review summarizes the harmful effects of spontaneous breathing on the lungs during mechanical ventilation in ARDS and suggests potential strategies to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent clinical and experimental studies have shown that vigorous spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation can potentially injure the lungs due to high transpulmonary pressure, the Pendelluft phenomenon, increased pulmonary perfusion, and patient-ventilator asynchrony. A definitive approach to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury is the systemic use of neuromuscular blocking agents; however, there is a risk of muscle atrophy. Alternatively, partial paralysis, bilateral phrenic nerve blockade, and sedatives may be useful for decreasing force generation from the diaphragm while maintaining muscle function. A higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone positioning may reduce force generation from the diaphragm by decreasing neuromechanical efficiency.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Several potential strategies, including neuromuscular blockade, partial paralysis, phrenic nerve blockade, sedatives, PEEP, and prone positioning, could be useful to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recent experimental and clinical studies have suggested that spontaneous effort can potentially injure the lungs. This review summarizes the harmful effects of spontaneous breathing on the lungs during mechanical ventilation in ARDS and suggests potential strategies to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.

Recent findings: Recent clinical and experimental studies have shown that vigorous spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation can potentially injure the lungs due to high transpulmonary pressure, the Pendelluft phenomenon, increased pulmonary perfusion, and patient-ventilator asynchrony. A definitive approach to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury is the systemic use of neuromuscular blocking agents; however, there is a risk of muscle atrophy. Alternatively, partial paralysis, bilateral phrenic nerve blockade, and sedatives may be useful for decreasing force generation from the diaphragm while maintaining muscle function. A higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone positioning may reduce force generation from the diaphragm by decreasing neuromechanical efficiency.

Summary: Several potential strategies, including neuromuscular blockade, partial paralysis, phrenic nerve blockade, sedatives, PEEP, and prone positioning, could be useful to minimize spontaneous breathing-induced lung injury.

机械通气患者自发呼吸引起的肺损伤。
回顾的目的:最近的实验和临床研究表明,自主呼吸可能会损伤肺部。本综述总结了 ARDS 患者机械通气期间自主呼吸对肺部的有害影响,并提出了减少自主呼吸引起的肺损伤的潜在策略:最近的临床和实验研究表明,机械通气过程中剧烈的自主呼吸可能会对肺部造成潜在伤害,其原因包括肺动脉高压、彭德鲁夫现象、肺灌注增加以及患者与呼吸机不同步。将自主呼吸引起的肺损伤降至最低的有效方法是全身使用神经肌肉阻断剂,但这有可能导致肌肉萎缩。另外,部分瘫痪、双侧膈神经阻断和镇静剂可能有助于减少膈肌产生的力量,同时保持肌肉功能。总结:包括神经肌肉阻滞、部分瘫痪、膈神经阻滞、镇静剂、呼气末正压(PEEP)和俯卧位在内的几种潜在策略可用于减少自主呼吸引起的肺损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信