Management of sedation during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hanna Vollbrecht, Bhakti K Patel
{"title":"Management of sedation during weaning from mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Hanna Vollbrecht, Bhakti K Patel","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes of review: </strong>Critically ill patients frequently require mechanical ventilation and often receive sedation to control pain, reduce anxiety, and facilitate patient-ventilator interactions. Weaning from mechanical ventilation is intertwined with sedation management. In this review, we analyze the current evidence for sedation management during ventilatory weaning, including level of sedation, timing of sedation weaning, analgesic and sedative choices, and sedation management in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite a large body of evidence from the past 20 years regarding the importance of light sedation and paired spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials (SATs/SBTs) to promote ventilator weaning, recent studies show that implementation of these strategies lag in practice. The recent WEAN SAFE trial highlights the delay between meeting weaning criteria and first weaning attempt, with level of sedation predicting both delays and weaning failure. Recent studies show that targeted interventions around evidence-based practices for sedation weaning improve outcomes, though long-term sustainability remains a challenge.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Light or no sedation strategies that prioritize analgesia prior to sedatives along with paired SATs/SBTs promote ventilator liberation. Dexmedetomidine may have a role in weaning for agitated patients. Further investigation is needed into optimal sedation management for patients with ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purposes of review: Critically ill patients frequently require mechanical ventilation and often receive sedation to control pain, reduce anxiety, and facilitate patient-ventilator interactions. Weaning from mechanical ventilation is intertwined with sedation management. In this review, we analyze the current evidence for sedation management during ventilatory weaning, including level of sedation, timing of sedation weaning, analgesic and sedative choices, and sedation management in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Recent findings: Despite a large body of evidence from the past 20 years regarding the importance of light sedation and paired spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials (SATs/SBTs) to promote ventilator weaning, recent studies show that implementation of these strategies lag in practice. The recent WEAN SAFE trial highlights the delay between meeting weaning criteria and first weaning attempt, with level of sedation predicting both delays and weaning failure. Recent studies show that targeted interventions around evidence-based practices for sedation weaning improve outcomes, though long-term sustainability remains a challenge.

Summary: Light or no sedation strategies that prioritize analgesia prior to sedatives along with paired SATs/SBTs promote ventilator liberation. Dexmedetomidine may have a role in weaning for agitated patients. Further investigation is needed into optimal sedation management for patients with ARDS.

机械通气断奶期间的镇静管理。
审查目的:重症患者经常需要进行机械通气,并经常接受镇静剂治疗,以控制疼痛、减轻焦虑并促进患者与呼吸机之间的互动。机械通气的断奶与镇静管理息息相关。在这篇综述中,我们分析了呼吸机断流期间镇静管理的现有证据,包括镇静的程度、镇静断流的时机、镇痛剂和镇静剂的选择以及急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)中的镇静管理:尽管过去 20 年来已有大量证据表明,轻度镇静和配对自发唤醒与自发呼吸试验(SAT/SBT)对促进呼吸机断奶非常重要,但最近的研究表明,这些策略的实施在实践中滞后。最近的 WEAN SAFE 试验强调了从达到断奶标准到首次尝试断奶之间的延迟,而镇静水平可预测延迟和断奶失败。最近的研究表明,围绕镇静断奶的循证实践进行有针对性的干预可改善疗效,但长期可持续性仍是一个挑战。摘要:轻度或无镇静策略优先考虑镇痛,然后再使用镇静剂,同时配对 SAT/SBT,可促进呼吸机解脱。右美托咪定可能在躁动患者的断奶过程中发挥作用。需要进一步研究针对 ARDS 患者的最佳镇静管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信