Patient-reported outcomes related to migraine burden among patients treated with standard-of-care preventive medications or calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies: a United States and Europe cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2024.2427884
Oralee J Varnado, James Jackson, Lucas Scharf, Gilwan Kim, Sarah Cotton
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes related to migraine burden among patients treated with standard-of-care preventive medications or calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies: a United States and Europe cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Oralee J Varnado, James Jackson, Lucas Scharf, Gilwan Kim, Sarah Cotton","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2024.2427884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment in patients with migraine who received preventive treatment by comparing standard of care preventive medications and calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), including galcanezumab alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study conducted across the United States (US) and Europe used data from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme. Physicians completed record forms for consecutive patients, who then completed self-report forms assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment. <i>T</i>-tests, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2022 to June 2023, 557 physicians submitted data for 6723 patients. A total of 4036 patients (US 956; Europe 3080) with a history of preventive treatment were included (>60% female, >80% White, mean [standard deviation] age range, 38.7 [12.8] to 46.3 [12.1]). Patients who received 3+ lines of preventive therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs (including galcanezumab alone) had enhanced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to those who received standard of care. Similar findings were observed across Europe; however, in the US, there was no significant difference in any PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with migraine in the overall population and Europe who received 3+ lines of preventive migraine therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs/galcanezumab demonstrated enhanced HRQoL compared to those who received standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"2179-2190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2427884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment in patients with migraine who received preventive treatment by comparing standard of care preventive medications and calcitonin gene-related monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs), including galcanezumab alone.

Methods: This cross-sectional study conducted across the United States (US) and Europe used data from the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme. Physicians completed record forms for consecutive patients, who then completed self-report forms assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life, migraine disability, and work productivity and activity impairment. T-tests, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis.

Results: From May 2022 to June 2023, 557 physicians submitted data for 6723 patients. A total of 4036 patients (US 956; Europe 3080) with a history of preventive treatment were included (>60% female, >80% White, mean [standard deviation] age range, 38.7 [12.8] to 46.3 [12.1]). Patients who received 3+ lines of preventive therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs (including galcanezumab alone) had enhanced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to those who received standard of care. Similar findings were observed across Europe; however, in the US, there was no significant difference in any PROs.

Conclusion: Patients with migraine in the overall population and Europe who received 3+ lines of preventive migraine therapy and were receiving CGRP mAbs/galcanezumab demonstrated enhanced HRQoL compared to those who received standard of care.

使用标准预防药物或降钙素基因相关单克隆抗体治疗偏头痛患者的患者报告结果:美国和欧洲横断面调查。
目的通过比较标准预防性治疗药物和降钙素基因相关单克隆抗体(CGRP mAbs)(包括单用 galcanezumab),评估接受预防性治疗的偏头痛患者的生活质量、偏头痛致残率、工作效率和活动障碍:这项横跨美国和欧洲的横断面研究使用了阿德尔菲偏头痛疾病专项计划(Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme)的数据。医生填写了连续患者的记录表,患者随后填写了自我报告表,评估患者报告的结果(PROs),如生活质量、偏头痛残疾、工作效率和活动障碍。分析采用T检验、费雪精确检验和曼-惠特尼U检验:从 2022 年 5 月到 2023 年 6 月,557 名医生提交了 6723 名患者的数据。共纳入 4036 名有预防性治疗史的患者(美国 956 名;欧洲 3080 名)(女性比例大于 60%,白人比例大于 80%,平均 [标准差] 年龄范围为 38.7 [12.8] 至 46.3 [12.1])。与接受标准治疗的患者相比,接受3种以上预防性治疗并接受CGRP mAbs(包括单用galcanezumab)的患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有所提高。在欧洲也观察到了类似的结果;但在美国,任何PROs都没有显著差异:结论:与接受标准治疗的偏头痛患者相比,接受3种以上偏头痛预防性治疗并正在接受CGRP mAbs/galcanezumab治疗的偏头痛患者的HRQoL有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信