Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity in cephalic shape.

IF 5.2 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Harriet B Drage, Stephen Pates
{"title":"Distinct causes underlie double-peaked trilobite morphological disparity in cephalic shape.","authors":"Harriet B Drage, Stephen Pates","doi":"10.1038/s42003-024-07221-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trilobite cephalic shape disparity varied through geological time and was integral to their ecological niche diversity, and so is widely used for taxonomic assignments. To fully appreciate trilobite cephalic evolution, we must understand how this disparity varies and the factors responsible. We explore trilobite cephalic disparity using a dataset of 983 cephalon outlines of c. 520 species, analysing the associations between cephalic morphometry and taxonomic assignment and geological Period. Elliptical Fourier transformation visualised as a Principal Components Analysis suggests significant differences in morphospace occupation and in disparity measures between the groups. Cephalic shape disparity peaks in the Ordovician and Devonian. The Cambrian-Ordovician expansion of morphospace occupation reflects radiations to new niches, with all trilobite orders established by the late Ordovician. In comparison, the Silurian-Devonian expansion seems solely a result of within-niche diversification. Linear Discriminant Analyses cross-validation, average cephalon shapes, and centroid distances demonstrate that, except for Harpida and the Cambrian and Ordovician Periods, order and geological Period cannot be robustly predicted for an unknown trilobite. Further, k-means clustering analyses suggest the total dataset naturally subdivides into only seven groups that do not correspond with taxonomy, though k-means clusters do decrease in number through the Palaeozoic, aligning with findings of decreasing disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10552,"journal":{"name":"Communications Biology","volume":"7 1","pages":"1490"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07221-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trilobite cephalic shape disparity varied through geological time and was integral to their ecological niche diversity, and so is widely used for taxonomic assignments. To fully appreciate trilobite cephalic evolution, we must understand how this disparity varies and the factors responsible. We explore trilobite cephalic disparity using a dataset of 983 cephalon outlines of c. 520 species, analysing the associations between cephalic morphometry and taxonomic assignment and geological Period. Elliptical Fourier transformation visualised as a Principal Components Analysis suggests significant differences in morphospace occupation and in disparity measures between the groups. Cephalic shape disparity peaks in the Ordovician and Devonian. The Cambrian-Ordovician expansion of morphospace occupation reflects radiations to new niches, with all trilobite orders established by the late Ordovician. In comparison, the Silurian-Devonian expansion seems solely a result of within-niche diversification. Linear Discriminant Analyses cross-validation, average cephalon shapes, and centroid distances demonstrate that, except for Harpida and the Cambrian and Ordovician Periods, order and geological Period cannot be robustly predicted for an unknown trilobite. Further, k-means clustering analyses suggest the total dataset naturally subdivides into only seven groups that do not correspond with taxonomy, though k-means clusters do decrease in number through the Palaeozoic, aligning with findings of decreasing disparity.

头状双峰三叶虫形态差异的原因是不同的。
三叶虫的头状外形差异随着地质年代的变化而变化,是其生态位多样性不可或缺的一部分,因此被广泛用于分类。要全面了解三叶虫头形的进化,我们必须了解这种差异是如何变化的,以及造成这种差异的因素。我们使用一个包含约 520 个物种的 983 个头骨轮廓的数据集来探索三叶虫头骨的差异,分析头骨形态学与分类归属和地质时期之间的关联。作为主成分分析的椭圆傅立叶变换表明,各组之间在形态空间占据和差异度测量方面存在显著差异。头形差异在奥陶纪和泥盆纪达到高峰。寒武纪-奥陶纪形态空间占据的扩大反映了向新壁龛的辐射,所有的三叶虫类都在奥陶纪晚期建立起来。相比之下,志留纪-泥盆纪的扩展似乎完全是种内多样化的结果。线性判别分析(Larar Discriminant Analyses)的交叉验证、平均头骨形状和中心点距离表明,除了Harpida以及寒武纪和奥陶纪之外,对于未知的三叶虫来说,无法准确预测其阶次和地质时期。此外,K-均值聚类分析表明,整个数据集只自然划分为七个组,与分类学并不一致,但在古生代,K-均值聚类的数量确实在减少,这与差异减少的发现相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communications Biology
Communications Biology Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1233
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Biology is an open access journal from Nature Research publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the biological sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances bringing new biological insight to a specialized area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信