Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Parth K Savsani, Sikandar H Khan, Anthony J Perkins, Sophia Wang, Samreen Jawaid, Salwa Moiz, Patrick O Monahan, Kurt Kroenke, Sujuan Gao, Babar A Khan
{"title":"Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.","authors":"Parth K Savsani, Sikandar H Khan, Anthony J Perkins, Sophia Wang, Samreen Jawaid, Salwa Moiz, Patrick O Monahan, Kurt Kroenke, Sujuan Gao, Babar A Khan","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report (HABC-M SR) in assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) among Acute Respiratory Failure ICU survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients evaluated by a nurse care coordinator in an out-of-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>English-speaking adults 18 years old or older who were admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients randomized to the intervention arm of the mobile critical care recovery program, a negative trial testing multidisciplinary care to improve quality of life.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>HABC-M SR scale was used to assess PICS in the intervention group at ICU discharge, 3, and 6 months post-discharge. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity Scale; Timed Up and Go; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep scores were obtained at the same time. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered at baseline and 6 months. ICU survivors reported mild PICS symptoms, which improved over 6 months (mean HABC-M SR scores: baseline [8.5, sd 7.6], 3 mo [5.3 mo, sd 6.6 mo], and 6 mo [5.2 mo, sd 6.9 mo; p < 0.001]). HABC-M SR total score had moderate internal consistency that improved over time (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78 at baseline and 0.84 at 6 mo). The psychological subscale of HABC-M SR was moderately correlated with standardized scales for mood, pain, and sleep. The cognitive subscale was not significantly correlated with MMSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While HABC-M SR correlated with mood, physical, and sleep symptoms, the cognitive subscale was less sensitive compared with standardized scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report (HABC-M SR) in assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) among Acute Respiratory Failure ICU survivors.

Design: Secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Patients evaluated by a nurse care coordinator in an out-of-hospital setting.

Patients: English-speaking adults 18 years old or older who were admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 24 hours.

Interventions: Patients randomized to the intervention arm of the mobile critical care recovery program, a negative trial testing multidisciplinary care to improve quality of life.

Measurements and main results: HABC-M SR scale was used to assess PICS in the intervention group at ICU discharge, 3, and 6 months post-discharge. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity Scale; Timed Up and Go; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep scores were obtained at the same time. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered at baseline and 6 months. ICU survivors reported mild PICS symptoms, which improved over 6 months (mean HABC-M SR scores: baseline [8.5, sd 7.6], 3 mo [5.3 mo, sd 6.6 mo], and 6 mo [5.2 mo, sd 6.9 mo; p < 0.001]). HABC-M SR total score had moderate internal consistency that improved over time (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78 at baseline and 0.84 at 6 mo). The psychological subscale of HABC-M SR was moderately correlated with standardized scales for mood, pain, and sleep. The cognitive subscale was not significantly correlated with MMSE.

Conclusions: While HABC-M SR correlated with mood, physical, and sleep symptoms, the cognitive subscale was less sensitive compared with standardized scales.

健康老龄化脑护理监测仪自我报告在监测急性呼吸衰竭幸存者重症监护后综合征方面的表现。
目的描述健康老年脑护理监测自我报告(HABC-M SR)在评估急性呼吸衰竭重症监护病房幸存者重症监护后综合征(PICS)中的表现:设计:随机对照试验的二次数据分析:由护理协调员护士在院外环境中对患者进行评估:患者:18 岁或以上讲英语的成年人,因急性呼吸衰竭入住重症监护病房,需要有创或无创机械通气超过或等于 24 小时:患者被随机分配到移动重症监护康复计划的干预组,该计划是一项负面试验,旨在测试多学科护理以提高生活质量:采用 HABC-M SR 量表评估干预组患者在 ICU 出院时、出院后 3 个月和 6 个月的 PICS。同时获得医院焦虑和抑郁量表;疼痛、生活乐趣和一般活动量表;定时起床和走动;以及患者报告结果测量信息系统睡眠评分。在基线和 6 个月时进行了迷你精神状态检查 (MMSE)。重症监护室幸存者的 PICS 症状轻微,6 个月后症状有所改善(HABC-M SR 平均得分:基线[8.5,sd 7.6],3 个月[5.3 个月,sd 6.6 个月],6 个月[5.2 个月,sd 6.9 个月; p < 0.001])。HABC-M SR总分具有中等程度的内部一致性,并随着时间的推移而提高(基线时的Cronbach's alpha=0.78,6个月时的Cronbach's alpha=0.84)。HABC-M SR的心理分量表与情绪、疼痛和睡眠的标准化量表呈中度相关。认知分量表与 MMSE 没有明显相关性:虽然 HABC-M SR 与情绪、身体和睡眠症状相关,但认知分量表与标准化量表相比敏感性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信