{"title":"Vitamin and mineral supplements: Are they associated with fatigue?","authors":"Sisi Xie, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Vanessa Kraege","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2084 (50.8% female, 61.7±9.8 years) and 1728 (49.6% female, 64.1±9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean±sem 3.04±0.13 vs. 2.82±0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03, p=0.952) and CFS (5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06, p=0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04, p<0.001) and CFS (6.19±0.11 vs. 5.58±0.06, p<0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93±0.07 vs. 2.81±0.04, p=0.161) and CFS (5.78±0.12 vs. 5.54±0.07, p=0.088) CONCLUSION: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.
Methods: Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).
Results: Overall, 2084 (50.8% female, 61.7±9.8 years) and 1728 (49.6% female, 64.1±9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean±sem 3.04±0.13 vs. 2.82±0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17±0.22 vs. 5.72±0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p=0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83±0.19 vs. 2.84±0.03, p=0.952) and CFS (5.38±0.33 vs. 5.61±0.06, p=0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03±0.06 vs. 2.76±0.04, p<0.001) and CFS (6.19±0.11 vs. 5.58±0.06, p<0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93±0.07 vs. 2.81±0.04, p=0.161) and CFS (5.78±0.12 vs. 5.54±0.07, p=0.088) CONCLUSION: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.