Predicting Reprisal of Solid Cancer Treatment and 60-Month Survival after Medical Intensive Care: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1159/000542101
Victoria Ferrari, Lucas Morand, Hervé Hyvernat, Renaud Schiappa, Jean Dellamonica, Nihal Martis
{"title":"Predicting Reprisal of Solid Cancer Treatment and 60-Month Survival after Medical Intensive Care: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.","authors":"Victoria Ferrari, Lucas Morand, Hervé Hyvernat, Renaud Schiappa, Jean Dellamonica, Nihal Martis","doi":"10.1159/000542101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aimed to identify relevant features associated with the reprisal of antineoplastic treatment in patients with solid cancers after unplanned admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to assess 60th-month survival in patients with solid neoplasms admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective study of critically ill patients with active cancers was performed over a 13-year period (2005-2018). Patients' characteristics, overall survival, and antineoplastic treatment reprisal were extracted from digital medical files and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>134 patients were included in the study. Solid neoplasms were mostly localised to the head and neck (n = 53) followed by lung cancers (n = 29). Sepsis was the leading cause of ICU admission (62.1%) with 41/82 patients presenting with septic shock. Antineoplastic treatments were resumed in 40 patients. An age ≤60 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤1 were found to be predictors for treatment reprisal, with odd ratios of, respectively, 2.83 (95% CI, 1.15-6.99) and 5.45 (95% CI, 2.01-14.82); area under the ROC curve of 72% (95% CI, 63-81%). Survival after the immediate discharge from the ICU was 101/134 (75%) and the 60-month survival rate was 29% and significantly higher in the treatment-reprisal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age and ECOG PS were found to be predictors for treatment reprisal in patients with solid neoplasms admitted to the ICU. The latter benefits from better long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our study aimed to identify relevant features associated with the reprisal of antineoplastic treatment in patients with solid cancers after unplanned admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to assess 60th-month survival in patients with solid neoplasms admitted to the ICU.

Methods: This single-centre retrospective study of critically ill patients with active cancers was performed over a 13-year period (2005-2018). Patients' characteristics, overall survival, and antineoplastic treatment reprisal were extracted from digital medical files and compared.

Results: 134 patients were included in the study. Solid neoplasms were mostly localised to the head and neck (n = 53) followed by lung cancers (n = 29). Sepsis was the leading cause of ICU admission (62.1%) with 41/82 patients presenting with septic shock. Antineoplastic treatments were resumed in 40 patients. An age ≤60 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤1 were found to be predictors for treatment reprisal, with odd ratios of, respectively, 2.83 (95% CI, 1.15-6.99) and 5.45 (95% CI, 2.01-14.82); area under the ROC curve of 72% (95% CI, 63-81%). Survival after the immediate discharge from the ICU was 101/134 (75%) and the 60-month survival rate was 29% and significantly higher in the treatment-reprisal group.

Conclusions: Age and ECOG PS were found to be predictors for treatment reprisal in patients with solid neoplasms admitted to the ICU. The latter benefits from better long-term survival.

预测对实体癌治疗的报复和医疗重症监护后 60 个月的生存率。单中心队列研究。
简介我们的研究旨在确定实体瘤患者意外入住重症监护室(ICU)后重新接受抗肿瘤治疗的相关特征,并评估入住重症监护室的实体瘤患者的第60个月生存率:这项针对活动性癌症重症患者的单中心回顾性研究历时13年(2005-2018年)。研究人员从数字医疗档案中提取了患者的特征、总生存率和抗肿瘤治疗反响,并进行了比较:研究共纳入 134 名患者。实体瘤多发于头颈部(53例),其次是肺癌(29例)。脓毒症是入住重症监护病房的主要原因(62.1%),其中41/82名患者出现脓毒性休克。40名患者恢复了抗肿瘤治疗。研究发现,年龄≤60岁和东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)≤1是治疗恢复的预测因素,奇异比分别为2.83(95%CI,1.15-6.99)和5.45(95%CI,2.01-14.82);ROC曲线下面积为72%(95%CI,63-81%)。重症监护室出院后的存活率为101/134(75%),60个月的存活率为29%,治疗-再治疗组的存活率明显更高:结论:研究发现,年龄和 ECOG PS 是重症监护室收治的实体瘤患者重新接受治疗的预测因素。后者的长期生存率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信