Risk and Protective Effects of Need for Approval on Self-Injury in Adolescent Girls.

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Child Psychiatry & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01779-y

Rebekah B Clapham, Zihua Ye, Leah H Somerville, Adam Bryant Miller, Matteo Giletta, Paul D Hastings, George M Slavich, Matthew K Nock, Mitchell J Prinstein, Karen D Rudolph

{"title":"Risk and Protective Effects of Need for Approval on Self-Injury in Adolescent Girls.","authors":"Rebekah B Clapham, Zihua Ye, Leah H Somerville, Adam Bryant Miller, Matteo Giletta, Paul D Hastings, George M Slavich, Matthew K Nock, Mitchell J Prinstein, Karen D Rudolph","doi":"10.1007/s10578-024-01779-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this research was to expand theoretical models of adolescent suicide by exploring whether individual differences in adolescent girls' need for approval (NFAavoid and NFAapproach) contribute to risk for, or protection against, self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). We examined these novel hypotheses in a series of concurrent and longitudinal analyses in two samples of adolescent girls (Study 1: N = 89, Mage = 16.31 years, SD = 0.84, 67.4% White; Study 2: N = 229, Mage = 11.80, SD = 1.80, 49.8% White). Hierarchical linear and logistic regressions revealed that NFAavoid was generally associated with higher risk for SITBs, whereas NFAapproach generally had a protective effect against SITBs; moreover, the strength of these associations depended on the extent to which girls engaged in rumination. Together, these results suggest that encouraging girls to develop diverse foundations for their sense of self-worth beyond peer judgements may protect against SITBs.","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01779-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this research was to expand theoretical models of adolescent suicide by exploring whether individual differences in adolescent girls' need for approval (NFA_avoid and NFA_approach) contribute to risk for, or protection against, self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs). We examined these novel hypotheses in a series of concurrent and longitudinal analyses in two samples of adolescent girls (Study 1: N = 89, M_age = 16.31 years, SD = 0.84, 67.4% White; Study 2: N = 229, M_age = 11.80, SD = 1.80, 49.8% White). Hierarchical linear and logistic regressions revealed that NFA_avoid was generally associated with higher risk for SITBs, whereas NFA_approach generally had a protective effect against SITBs; moreover, the strength of these associations depended on the extent to which girls engaged in rumination. Together, these results suggest that encouraging girls to develop diverse foundations for their sense of self-worth beyond peer judgements may protect against SITBs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

需要认可对少女自伤的风险和保护作用。

本研究的目的是通过探讨青春期女孩对认可的需求（NFAavoid 和 NFAapproach）的个体差异是否会导致或防止自伤想法和行为（SITBs）的风险，从而扩展青少年自杀的理论模型。我们在两个青春期女孩样本（研究 1：样本数 = 89，年龄 = 16.31 岁，标准差 = 0.84，67.4% 为白人；研究 2：样本数 = 229，年龄 = 11.80，标准差 = 1.80，49.8% 为白人）中进行了一系列并发和纵向分析，对这些新假设进行了检验。分层线性回归和逻辑回归显示，NFAavoid 通常与 SITBs 的高风险相关，而 NFAapproach 通常对 SITBs 有保护作用；此外，这些关联的强度取决于女孩参与反刍的程度。总之，这些结果表明，鼓励女孩建立超越同伴评价的自我价值感的多元化基础，可能会保护她们免受 SITBs 的伤害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Child Psychiatry & Human Development Multiple-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

3.40%

发文量

174

期刊介绍： Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.