A systematic review and meta-analysis of the endothelial-immune candidate biomarker endoglin in rheumatic diseases.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Arduino A Mangoni, Angelo Zinellu
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the endothelial-immune candidate biomarker endoglin in rheumatic diseases.","authors":"Arduino A Mangoni, Angelo Zinellu","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01519-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing challenges in accurately diagnosing various rheumatic diseases (RDs) have stimulated the search for novel biomarkers to aid clinical evaluation and monitoring. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the candidate biomarker endoglin (CD105), a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in endothelial, myeloid, and lymphoid cells, in RD patients and healthy controls. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 10 August 2024 to identify relevant studies. We evaluated the risk of bias using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and the certainty of evidence using GRADE (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023581008). Overall, circulating endoglin concentrations were significantly higher in RD patients compared to controls (13 studies; standard mean difference, SMD = 0.64, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.14, p = 0.014; low certainty of evidence). The effect size of the between-group differences in endoglin concentrations was not significantly associated with age, male-to-female ratio, year of publication, number of participants, or mean RD duration. By contrast, the effect size was statistically significant in studies conducted in the European region (p = 0.033), involving patients with systemic sclerosis (p = 0.032), and measuring serum (p = 0.019). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest the potential pathophysiological role of endoglin in RDs. This, however, requires further investigation in prospective studies, particularly in patients with systemic sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01519-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing challenges in accurately diagnosing various rheumatic diseases (RDs) have stimulated the search for novel biomarkers to aid clinical evaluation and monitoring. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the candidate biomarker endoglin (CD105), a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in endothelial, myeloid, and lymphoid cells, in RD patients and healthy controls. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 10 August 2024 to identify relevant studies. We evaluated the risk of bias using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and the certainty of evidence using GRADE (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023581008). Overall, circulating endoglin concentrations were significantly higher in RD patients compared to controls (13 studies; standard mean difference, SMD = 0.64, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.14, p = 0.014; low certainty of evidence). The effect size of the between-group differences in endoglin concentrations was not significantly associated with age, male-to-female ratio, year of publication, number of participants, or mean RD duration. By contrast, the effect size was statistically significant in studies conducted in the European region (p = 0.033), involving patients with systemic sclerosis (p = 0.032), and measuring serum (p = 0.019). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest the potential pathophysiological role of endoglin in RDs. This, however, requires further investigation in prospective studies, particularly in patients with systemic sclerosis.

风湿性疾病中内皮免疫候选生物标志物内皮素的系统综述和荟萃分析。
准确诊断各种风湿性疾病(RDs)所面临的挑战促使人们寻找新型生物标记物来帮助临床评估和监测。我们对研究 RD 患者和健康对照组的候选生物标志物内皮素(CD105)的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,内皮素是一种在内皮细胞、髓细胞和淋巴细胞中表达的跨膜糖蛋白。我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 8 月 10 日的 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science,以确定相关研究。我们使用 JBI 关键评估清单评估了偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估了证据的确定性(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023581008)。总体而言,与对照组相比,RD 患者的循环内皮素浓度明显较高(13 项研究;标准平均差,SMD = 0.64,95% CI 0.13 至 1.14,p = 0.014;证据确定性较低)。内皮素浓度组间差异的效应大小与年龄、男女比例、发表年份、参与者人数或平均 RD 持续时间无显著相关性。相比之下,在欧洲地区进行的研究(p = 0.033)、涉及系统性硬化症患者的研究(p = 0.032)和测量血清的研究(p = 0.019)的效应大小具有统计学意义。本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,内胚叶蛋白在 RDs 中具有潜在的病理生理作用。不过,这还需要在前瞻性研究中进行进一步调查,尤其是在系统性硬化症患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信