Tumor Response and Its Impact on Treatment Failure in Rectal Cancer: Does Intensity of Neoadjuvant Treatment Matter?

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/cancers16213673
Markus Diefenhardt, Daniel Martin, Maximilian Fleischmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Michael Ghadimi, Claus Rödel, Emmanouil Fokas
{"title":"Tumor Response and Its Impact on Treatment Failure in Rectal Cancer: Does Intensity of Neoadjuvant Treatment Matter?","authors":"Markus Diefenhardt, Daniel Martin, Maximilian Fleischmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Michael Ghadimi, Claus Rödel, Emmanouil Fokas","doi":"10.3390/cancers16213673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Additional adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer with limited response to neoadjuvant treatment to mitigate their higher risk of treatment failure remains controversial. <b>Methods:</b> This is a post hoc analysis of a cohort study of 3 randomized phase 2 or 3 trials (CAO/ARO/AIO-94, -04, and -12 trial) that included 1948 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. After excluding patients with missing information, 1788 patients (1254 men and 524 women; median age: 62.6 years, age range: 19-84 years) were eligible. We analyzed the extent of tumor response and its association with the incidence of treatment failure after different neoadjuvant treatment approaches. <b>Results:</b> Tumor response was significantly enhanced with more intensive neoadjuvant treatment. After a median follow-up of 55 months for the entire cohort (IQR: 37 months-62 months), the incidence of treatment failure (TF) stratified by tumor response or post-neoadjuvant pathological outcome was not significantly affected by the intensity of neoadjuvant treatment, whereas the ypTNM stage was significantly associated with the risk of treatment failure. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this cohort study, we provide evidence that limited or no response to intensified neoadjuvant treatment protocols is not likely to be more strongly associated with an extensive risk of TF after 5-FU CRT+/- adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Additional adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer with limited response to neoadjuvant treatment to mitigate their higher risk of treatment failure remains controversial. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a cohort study of 3 randomized phase 2 or 3 trials (CAO/ARO/AIO-94, -04, and -12 trial) that included 1948 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. After excluding patients with missing information, 1788 patients (1254 men and 524 women; median age: 62.6 years, age range: 19-84 years) were eligible. We analyzed the extent of tumor response and its association with the incidence of treatment failure after different neoadjuvant treatment approaches. Results: Tumor response was significantly enhanced with more intensive neoadjuvant treatment. After a median follow-up of 55 months for the entire cohort (IQR: 37 months-62 months), the incidence of treatment failure (TF) stratified by tumor response or post-neoadjuvant pathological outcome was not significantly affected by the intensity of neoadjuvant treatment, whereas the ypTNM stage was significantly associated with the risk of treatment failure. Conclusions: In this cohort study, we provide evidence that limited or no response to intensified neoadjuvant treatment protocols is not likely to be more strongly associated with an extensive risk of TF after 5-FU CRT+/- adjuvant chemotherapy.

肿瘤反应及其对直肠癌治疗失败的影响:新辅助治疗的强度是否重要?
目的:对新辅助治疗反应有限的直肠癌患者进行额外辅助治疗以降低其治疗失败的高风险仍存在争议。方法这是对 3 项随机 2 期或 3 期试验(CAO/ARO/AIO-94、-04 和 -12 试验)的队列研究进行的事后分析,共纳入 1948 例局部晚期直肠腺癌患者。在排除信息缺失的患者后,符合条件的患者有 1788 名(男性 1254 名,女性 524 名;中位年龄:62.6 岁,年龄范围:19-84 岁)。我们分析了肿瘤反应程度及其与不同新辅助治疗方法治疗失败发生率的关系。结果显示新辅助治疗强度越大,肿瘤反应越明显。整个队列的中位随访时间为55个月(IQR:37个月-62个月),按肿瘤反应或新辅助治疗后病理结果分层的治疗失败(TF)发生率并未受到新辅助治疗强度的显著影响,而ypTNM分期与治疗失败风险显著相关。结论:在这项队列研究中,我们提供的证据表明,对强化新辅助治疗方案反应有限或无反应不可能与5-FU CRT+/-辅助化疗后TF的广泛风险更密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信