Dynamic prediction of kidney allograft and patient survival using post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectory.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae314
Khandoker Shuvo Bakar, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Ryan Gately, Farzaneh Boroumand, Wai H Lim, Germaine Wong
{"title":"Dynamic prediction of kidney allograft and patient survival using post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectory.","authors":"Khandoker Shuvo Bakar, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Ryan Gately, Farzaneh Boroumand, Wai H Lim, Germaine Wong","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allograft loss is the most feared outcome of kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to develop a dynamic Bayesian model using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectories to predict long-term allograft and patient survivals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry and included all adult kidney transplant recipients (1980-2017) in Australia (derivation cohort) and New Zealand (NZ, validation cohort). Using a joint model, the temporal changes of eGFR trajectories were used to predict patient and allograft survivals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort composed of 14 915 kidney transplant recipients [12 777 (86%) from Australia and 2138 (14%) from NZ] who were followed for a median of 8.9 years. In the derivation cohort, eGFR trajectory was inversely associated with allograft loss [every 10 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> reduction in eGFR, adjusted hazard ratio [HR, 95% credible intervals (95%CI) 1.31 (1.23-1.39)] and death [1.12 (1.10-1.14)]. Similar estimates were observed in the validation cohort. The respective dynamic area under curve (AUC) (95%CI) estimates for predicting allograft loss at 5-years post-transplantation were 0.83 (0.75-0.91) and 0.81 (0.68-0.93) for the derivation and validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This straightforward model, using a single metric of eGFR trajectory, shows good model performance, and effectively distinguish transplant recipients who are at risk of death and allograft loss from those who are not. This simple bedside tool may facilitate early identification of individuals at risk of allograft loss and death.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 11","pages":"sfae314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allograft loss is the most feared outcome of kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to develop a dynamic Bayesian model using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectories to predict long-term allograft and patient survivals.

Methods: We used data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry and included all adult kidney transplant recipients (1980-2017) in Australia (derivation cohort) and New Zealand (NZ, validation cohort). Using a joint model, the temporal changes of eGFR trajectories were used to predict patient and allograft survivals.

Results: The cohort composed of 14 915 kidney transplant recipients [12 777 (86%) from Australia and 2138 (14%) from NZ] who were followed for a median of 8.9 years. In the derivation cohort, eGFR trajectory was inversely associated with allograft loss [every 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 reduction in eGFR, adjusted hazard ratio [HR, 95% credible intervals (95%CI) 1.31 (1.23-1.39)] and death [1.12 (1.10-1.14)]. Similar estimates were observed in the validation cohort. The respective dynamic area under curve (AUC) (95%CI) estimates for predicting allograft loss at 5-years post-transplantation were 0.83 (0.75-0.91) and 0.81 (0.68-0.93) for the derivation and validation cohorts.

Conclusion: This straightforward model, using a single metric of eGFR trajectory, shows good model performance, and effectively distinguish transplant recipients who are at risk of death and allograft loss from those who are not. This simple bedside tool may facilitate early identification of individuals at risk of allograft loss and death.

利用肾移植后估计肾小球滤过率轨迹动态预测肾移植和患者的存活率。
背景:异体移植物丢失是肾移植受者最担心的结果。我们旨在利用估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)轨迹建立一个动态贝叶斯模型,以预测长期异体移植和患者存活率:我们使用了澳大利亚和新西兰透析与移植登记处的数据,纳入了澳大利亚(衍生队列)和新西兰(新西兰,验证队列)的所有成人肾移植受者(1980-2017 年)。通过联合模型,利用 eGFR 轨迹的时间变化来预测患者和异体移植的存活率:该队列由 14 915 名肾移植受者组成,其中 12 777 人(86%)来自澳大利亚,2138 人(14%)来自新西兰,随访时间中位数为 8.9 年。在衍生队列中,eGFR轨迹与异体移植物丢失[eGFR每降低10 ml/min/1.73 m2,调整后的危险比[HR,95%可信区间(95%CI)为1.31 (1.23-1.39)]和死亡[1.12 (1.10-1.14)]成反比。在验证队列中也观察到类似的估计值。在衍生队列和验证队列中,预测移植后5年异体移植物丢失的动态曲线下面积(AUC)(95%CI)估计值分别为0.83(0.75-0.91)和0.81(0.68-0.93):这个简单明了的模型使用单一的 eGFR 轨迹指标,显示出良好的模型性能,能有效区分有死亡和异体移植损失风险的移植受者和无此风险的移植受者。这种简单的床边工具有助于早期识别有异体移植物丢失和死亡风险的受者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信