The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/cancers16213714
Ryan A Durgham, Sami I Nassar, Ramazan Gun, Shaun A Nguyen, Ameya A Asarkar, Cherie-Ann O Nathan
{"title":"The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ryan A Durgham, Sami I Nassar, Ramazan Gun, Shaun A Nguyen, Ameya A Asarkar, Cherie-Ann O Nathan","doi":"10.3390/cancers16213714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous melanoma is an increasingly common and potentially lethal form of skin cancer. Current staging systems based on clinical and pathological features have limitations in accurately predicting outcomes, particularly for early-stage disease. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test has emerged as a promising tool for improving risk stratification in melanoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the prognostic performance of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma. A comprehensive literature search was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting survival outcomes stratified by 31-GEP class were included. Random-effects models were used to determine survival estimates across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies comprising 14,760 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The 31-GEP test consistently stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different outcomes. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival rates were 99.8% (95% CI: 98-100%) for Class 1A, 97.6% (95% CI: 92.4-99.3%) for Class 1B/2A, and 83.4% (95% CI: 66.5-92.7%) for Class 2B. Similar trends were observed for recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis supports the prognostic utility of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma prognostication. The test consistently stratified patients into clinically meaningful risk groups across multiple survival metrics. These findings support the potential clinical utility of the 31-GEP test in enhancing current staging systems and informing personalized management strategies for melanoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"16 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous melanoma is an increasingly common and potentially lethal form of skin cancer. Current staging systems based on clinical and pathological features have limitations in accurately predicting outcomes, particularly for early-stage disease. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test has emerged as a promising tool for improving risk stratification in melanoma patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the prognostic performance of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma. A comprehensive literature search was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting survival outcomes stratified by 31-GEP class were included. Random-effects models were used to determine survival estimates across studies.

Results: Thirteen studies comprising 14,760 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The 31-GEP test consistently stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different outcomes. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival rates were 99.8% (95% CI: 98-100%) for Class 1A, 97.6% (95% CI: 92.4-99.3%) for Class 1B/2A, and 83.4% (95% CI: 66.5-92.7%) for Class 2B. Similar trends were observed for recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the prognostic utility of the 31-GEP test in cutaneous melanoma prognostication. The test consistently stratified patients into clinically meaningful risk groups across multiple survival metrics. These findings support the potential clinical utility of the 31-GEP test in enhancing current staging systems and informing personalized management strategies for melanoma patients.

皮肤黑色素瘤 31 基因表达谱检测的预后价值:系统回顾与元分析》(The Prognostic Value of 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
背景:皮肤黑色素瘤是一种日益常见且可能致命的皮肤癌。目前基于临床和病理特征的分期系统在准确预测预后方面存在局限性,尤其是早期疾病。31基因表达谱(31-GEP)检测已成为改善黑色素瘤患者风险分层的一种有前途的工具:我们对评估皮肤黑色素瘤 31-GEP 检测预后性能的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了报告按31-GEP分层的生存结果的研究。结果:荟萃分析共纳入了 13 项研究,包括 14,760 名患者。31-GEP测试一致地将患者分为风险组,并得出了显著不同的结果。1A 类患者的 5 年黑色素瘤特异性生存率为 99.8%(95% CI:98-100%),1B/2A 类患者的 5 年黑色素瘤特异性生存率为 97.6%(95% CI:92.4-99.3%),2B 类患者的 5 年黑色素瘤特异性生存率为 83.4%(95% CI:66.5-92.7%)。在无复发和无远处转移生存率方面也观察到类似的趋势:这项荟萃分析支持31-GEP检验在皮肤黑色素瘤预后判断中的作用。在多个生存指标上,该检验始终将患者分为有临床意义的风险组。这些研究结果支持31-GEP检验在加强现有分期系统和为黑色素瘤患者的个性化管理策略提供信息方面的潜在临床效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信