Is poor self-rated health associated with higher caries experience in adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1159/000542522
Siri Christine Rødseth, Hedda Høvik, Espen Bjertness, Rasa Skudutyte-Rysstad
{"title":"Is poor self-rated health associated with higher caries experience in adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study.","authors":"Siri Christine Rødseth, Hedda Høvik, Espen Bjertness, Rasa Skudutyte-Rysstad","doi":"10.1159/000542522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The association between lower socioeconomic status and a higher risk of dental caries is well established, but the independent association between general health status and dental caries on a population level is less investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the association between self-rated general health and caries experience in an adult Norwegian population and to assess if the associations were modified by age and sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected as part of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) conducted 2017-2019 and a randomly selected subsample (20%) were invited for the HUNT4 Oral Health Study. This cross-sectional study included 4,880 dentate participants aged 19-94 years (response rate 67%). Participants underwent clinical and radiographic oral examinations and caries experience was measured by numbers of decayed (DT), missing (MT), and filled teeth (FT), DMFT index. The DT component consisted of primary and secondary caries in dentine, cavitated root caries and remaining roots. Questionnaires were used to assess self-rated general health and socioeconomic position, denoted by education, household income and employment status. Associations between self-rated health and caries experience (DMFT) and components (DT, MT, and FT) were assessed using negative binomial regression models. Ratios of means (RMs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations were estimated, adjusting for socioeconomic position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with poor self-rated general health had a 29% higher mean number of MT (RM 1.29 (95%CI 1.13-1.46)), a 22% higher mean number of DT (RM 1.22 (95%CI 1.07-1.39)), and a 7% higher mean number of DMFT (RM 1.07 (95%CI 1.04-1.11)) than individuals reporting very good health. Age stratified analyses presented a more pronounced association between self-rated health and caries experience for individuals below the age of 55 years than for those 55 years or older. Similarly, the association was more evident for women, with significantly higher mean values for DMFT, MT and FT among women reporting poor health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated an independent association between poor self-rated health and a higher burden of caries experience, adjusted for education, income and employment status. The association was stronger for women and individuals below the age of 55 years. These findings add new evidence in understanding caries inequalities through self-rated health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The association between lower socioeconomic status and a higher risk of dental caries is well established, but the independent association between general health status and dental caries on a population level is less investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the association between self-rated general health and caries experience in an adult Norwegian population and to assess if the associations were modified by age and sex.

Methods: Data was collected as part of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) conducted 2017-2019 and a randomly selected subsample (20%) were invited for the HUNT4 Oral Health Study. This cross-sectional study included 4,880 dentate participants aged 19-94 years (response rate 67%). Participants underwent clinical and radiographic oral examinations and caries experience was measured by numbers of decayed (DT), missing (MT), and filled teeth (FT), DMFT index. The DT component consisted of primary and secondary caries in dentine, cavitated root caries and remaining roots. Questionnaires were used to assess self-rated general health and socioeconomic position, denoted by education, household income and employment status. Associations between self-rated health and caries experience (DMFT) and components (DT, MT, and FT) were assessed using negative binomial regression models. Ratios of means (RMs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations were estimated, adjusting for socioeconomic position.

Results: Individuals with poor self-rated general health had a 29% higher mean number of MT (RM 1.29 (95%CI 1.13-1.46)), a 22% higher mean number of DT (RM 1.22 (95%CI 1.07-1.39)), and a 7% higher mean number of DMFT (RM 1.07 (95%CI 1.04-1.11)) than individuals reporting very good health. Age stratified analyses presented a more pronounced association between self-rated health and caries experience for individuals below the age of 55 years than for those 55 years or older. Similarly, the association was more evident for women, with significantly higher mean values for DMFT, MT and FT among women reporting poor health.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated an independent association between poor self-rated health and a higher burden of caries experience, adjusted for education, income and employment status. The association was stronger for women and individuals below the age of 55 years. These findings add new evidence in understanding caries inequalities through self-rated health.

自评健康状况差是否与成人患龋率高有关?HUNT4口腔健康研究。
简介较低的社会经济地位与较高的龋齿风险之间的关系已得到公认,但在人口层面上,一般健康状况与龋齿之间的独立关系却鲜有研究。本研究旨在评估挪威成年人自评的总体健康状况与龋齿经历之间的关系,并评估这种关系是否会因年龄和性别而改变:数据收集是2017-2019年进行的特伦德拉格健康研究(HUNT4)的一部分,随机抽取的子样本(20%)被邀请参加HUNT4口腔健康研究。这项横断面研究包括 4880 名年龄在 19-94 岁之间的无牙参与者(回复率为 67%)。参与者接受了临床和放射学口腔检查,龋齿情况通过蛀牙(DT)、缺失牙(MT)和补牙(FT)的数量、DMFT 指数来衡量。DT 部分包括牙本质中的原发龋和继发龋、龋坏的牙根和残留的牙根。调查问卷用于评估自评的总体健康状况和社会经济地位(以教育程度、家庭收入和就业状况表示)。采用负二项回归模型评估了自评健康状况与龋病经历(DMFT)和龋病成分(DT、MT 和 FT)之间的关系。在对社会经济地位进行调整后,估算出了这些关联的均值比(RMs)和 95% 的置信区间(CI):结果:与健康状况很差的人相比,自评健康状况一般的人的 MT 平均数(RM 1.29 (95%CI 1.13-1.46))高出 29%,DT 平均数(RM 1.22 (95%CI 1.07-1.39))高出 22%,DMFT 平均数(RM 1.07 (95%CI 1.04-1.11))高出 7%。年龄分层分析表明,与 55 岁或以上的人相比,55 岁以下的人自评健康状况与龋病经历之间的关联更为明显。同样,这种关联在女性中更为明显,健康状况较差的女性的 DMFT、MT 和 FT 平均值明显更高:本研究表明,经教育、收入和就业状况调整后,自评健康状况差与龋病负担较重之间存在独立关联。女性和 55 岁以下人群的相关性更强。这些研究结果为了解通过自评健康状况造成的龋病不平等提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信