Mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
XiaoPeng Gu, SongOu Zhang, YongTao Liu, JunLiang Qi, YueQuan Gu, WeiHu Ma
{"title":"Mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.","authors":"XiaoPeng Gu, SongOu Zhang, YongTao Liu, JunLiang Qi, YueQuan Gu, WeiHu Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08019-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08019-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Methods: The clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients.

非接触式矫形机器人导航治疗腰椎滑脱症的中期疗效。
目的:本研究旨在探讨非接触式矫形机器人导航治疗腰椎间盘突出症的中期疗效:本研究旨在探讨非接触式矫形机器人导航治疗腰椎滑脱症的中期疗效:回顾性分析中青年腰椎滑脱症患者的临床资料,根据手术方法分为观察组和对照组。观察组采用微创经椎间孔椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)联合矫形机器人导航经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术;对照组采用传统后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)。比较两组围手术期指标、腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和并发症:本研究共纳入 32 名腰椎滑脱症患者,平均年龄(50.3±2.7)岁。观察组和对照组分别有 17 名和 15 名患者。虽然观察组的新手术技术可能需要更长的手术时间,但它在减少术中出血、术后引流和缩短住院时间方面具有显著优势。这些优势可能会使患者更快康复,降低并发症风险,提高整体生活质量。在术后 1 周、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月的 VAS 评分和 ODI 方面,新技术也明显优于传统方法。这些结果为患者提供了更好的治疗方案,并有可能加快康复速度。观察组和对照组分别有一例感染性切口和一例椎管内血肿形成。然而,两组的并发症发生率没有统计学差异(P > 0.05):结论:非接触式骨科机器人导航治疗腰椎间盘突出症是一种微创、精确、稳定的手术方法。结论:非接触式矫形机器人导航治疗腰椎间盘突出症被证明是一种微创、精确和稳定的手术方法,对于合适的患者来说是一种值得考虑的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信