Comparative study of simultaneous and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: is age a key factor in surgical outcomes?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mustafa Yalin, Hüseyin Yildiz, Mehmet Kaya, Fatih Golgelioglu
{"title":"Comparative study of simultaneous and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: is age a key factor in surgical outcomes?","authors":"Mustafa Yalin, Hüseyin Yildiz, Mehmet Kaya, Fatih Golgelioglu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08023-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (simBTKA) and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (stgBTKA) across different age groups, with a specific focus on patients under and over 65 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study design was employed to analyze the medical records of patients who underwent simBTKA or stgBTKA between August 2018 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on age and surgical approach. Various outcome measures including knee extension strength, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), length of stay (LOS), operating room time (ORT), and complication rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 162 patients, with 48 patients in the simBTKA group and 114 patients in the stgBTKA group. Across all age groups, simBTKA resulted in a significantly shorter LOS and ORT than stgBTKA (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in PROMs or in knee extension strength between the two surgical approaches. The complication rates were comparable between the groups, with no reported deaths within one year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with stgBTKA, simBTKA demonstrated superior efficacy in terms of reduced hospitalization duration and ORT, irrespective of age. Both surgical approaches yielded comparable clinical outcomes and complication rates across all age groups. Overall, the findings suggest that simBTKA is a viable option for appropriately selected patients, offering outcomes comparable to those of stgBTKA, with the added benefit of reduced hospitalization time and operating room utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08023-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (simBTKA) and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (stgBTKA) across different age groups, with a specific focus on patients under and over 65 years old.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed to analyze the medical records of patients who underwent simBTKA or stgBTKA between August 2018 and May 2023. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on age and surgical approach. Various outcome measures including knee extension strength, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), length of stay (LOS), operating room time (ORT), and complication rates were evaluated.

Results: The study included a total of 162 patients, with 48 patients in the simBTKA group and 114 patients in the stgBTKA group. Across all age groups, simBTKA resulted in a significantly shorter LOS and ORT than stgBTKA (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in PROMs or in knee extension strength between the two surgical approaches. The complication rates were comparable between the groups, with no reported deaths within one year after surgery.

Conclusion: Compared with stgBTKA, simBTKA demonstrated superior efficacy in terms of reduced hospitalization duration and ORT, irrespective of age. Both surgical approaches yielded comparable clinical outcomes and complication rates across all age groups. Overall, the findings suggest that simBTKA is a viable option for appropriately selected patients, offering outcomes comparable to those of stgBTKA, with the added benefit of reduced hospitalization time and operating room utilization.

同期和分期双侧全膝关节置换术比较研究:年龄是影响手术效果的关键因素吗?
研究背景本研究旨在比较不同年龄组的同步双侧全膝关节置换术(simBTKA)和分期双侧全膝关节置换术(stgBTKA)的疗效,特别关注65岁以下和65岁以上的患者:采用回顾性队列研究设计,分析2018年8月至2023年5月期间接受simBTKA或stgBTKA的患者病历。根据年龄和手术方式将患者分为4组。评估了各种结果指标,包括膝关节伸展力量、患者报告结果指标(PROMs)、住院时间(LOS)、手术室时间(ORT)和并发症发生率:研究共纳入了 162 名患者,其中 simBTKA 组 48 名,stgBTKA 组 114 名。在所有年龄组中,simBTKA 的 LOS 和 ORT 都明显短于 stgBTKA(p 结论:在所有年龄组中,simBTKA 的 LOS 和 ORT 都明显短于 stgBTKA:与 stgBTKA 相比,无论年龄如何,simBTKA 在缩短住院时间和 ORT 方面都表现出更优越的疗效。在所有年龄组中,两种手术方法的临床效果和并发症发生率相当。总之,研究结果表明,simBTKA 是经过适当选择的患者的可行选择,其疗效与 stgBTKA 相当,而且还能减少住院时间和手术室使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信