Danielle L. Mitchell, Tiffany M. Chambers, A. J. Agopian, Renata H. Benjamin, Charles J. Shumate, Anne Slavotinek, Robert B. Hufnagel, Brian P. Brooks, Laura E. Mitchell, Philip J. Lupo
{"title":"Epidemiology of Coloboma: Prevalence and Patterns in Texas, 1999–2014","authors":"Danielle L. Mitchell, Tiffany M. Chambers, A. J. Agopian, Renata H. Benjamin, Charles J. Shumate, Anne Slavotinek, Robert B. Hufnagel, Brian P. Brooks, Laura E. Mitchell, Philip J. Lupo","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <section>\n <h3> Background</h3>\n <p>Coloboma is a rare congenital malformation in which part of the tissue that makes up the eye is missing and may cause visual impairment or blindness. Little is known about the epidemiology of this condition. Therefore, we obtained data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry on children identified with coloboma for the period 1999–2014.</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Methods</h3>\n <p>Using information on all live births from the same period, prevalence ratios (PRs) for selected demographic and clinical factors were used to estimate associations using Poisson regression among cases with coloboma. Coloboma cases were divided into subgroups to explore patterns of co-occurring defects and syndromes. All variables significant in unadjusted models (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were included in multivariable models to evaluate adjusted PRs (aPRs).</p>\n </section> \n <section>\n <h3> Results</h3>\n <p>We identified 1587 cases with coloboma, of whom 934 (58.8%) were nonsyndromic, and 474 (29.9%) were isolated. When considering all identified cases, factors associated with significant differences in prevalence included plurality (multiple vs. singleton aPR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1–1.8); maternal education (college or greater vs. less than high school aPR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9); maternal race/ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White aPR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0); and maternal diabetes (yes vs. no aPR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6). There was a notable increase in the birth prevalence of coloboma during the study period (<i>p</i>-for-trend < 0.001). Effect estimates were similar across the different subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n <p>In our large population, we identified several factors associated with the prevalence of coloboma. These findings may help define subgroups of women more likely to have children affected by coloboma, which could inform improved screening efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"116 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Coloboma is a rare congenital malformation in which part of the tissue that makes up the eye is missing and may cause visual impairment or blindness. Little is known about the epidemiology of this condition. Therefore, we obtained data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry on children identified with coloboma for the period 1999–2014.
Methods
Using information on all live births from the same period, prevalence ratios (PRs) for selected demographic and clinical factors were used to estimate associations using Poisson regression among cases with coloboma. Coloboma cases were divided into subgroups to explore patterns of co-occurring defects and syndromes. All variables significant in unadjusted models (p < 0.05) were included in multivariable models to evaluate adjusted PRs (aPRs).
Results
We identified 1587 cases with coloboma, of whom 934 (58.8%) were nonsyndromic, and 474 (29.9%) were isolated. When considering all identified cases, factors associated with significant differences in prevalence included plurality (multiple vs. singleton aPR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1–1.8); maternal education (college or greater vs. less than high school aPR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9); maternal race/ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White aPR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8–1.0); and maternal diabetes (yes vs. no aPR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0–1.6). There was a notable increase in the birth prevalence of coloboma during the study period (p-for-trend < 0.001). Effect estimates were similar across the different subgroups.
Conclusion
In our large population, we identified several factors associated with the prevalence of coloboma. These findings may help define subgroups of women more likely to have children affected by coloboma, which could inform improved screening efforts.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.