Developing a Novel Surgical Care Access Score for Osteoarthritis Patients Considering Total Knee Replacement.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hassan M K Ghomrawi, Lynn W Huang, Kevin Credit, Aynaz Lotfata, Anjali Malhotra, Ankita M Patel, Patricia Franklin, Dustin D French, Daniel Block
{"title":"Developing a Novel Surgical Care Access Score for Osteoarthritis Patients Considering Total Knee Replacement.","authors":"Hassan M K Ghomrawi, Lynn W Huang, Kevin Credit, Aynaz Lotfata, Anjali Malhotra, Ankita M Patel, Patricia Franklin, Dustin D French, Daniel Block","doi":"10.1002/acr.25463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Access to specialized orthopedic care is an important determinant of the decision to undergo total knee replacement (TKR); however, most studies have mainly utilized distance to the nearest high-volume hospital as the primary proxy for access. We applied the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to develop a more comprehensive TKR access score that accounts for other potential factors, i.e., supply of and demand for this procedure, that also affect access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To apply the 2SFCA method, we first estimated TKR demand using the CDC estimates of prevalence of osteoarthritis, which was multiplied by estimates of patients who would potentially benefit from TKR. We then estimated TKR supply using the number of TKRs performed in each hospital, extracted from the CMS MedPAR database. For the nationwide analysis, we estimated the access score for a radius of 55 km around each census tract in the contiguous US. For a subset of the census tracts, we employed a more realistic but more computationally intensive 42-minute driving distance to determine the robustness of the 55 km assumption, and calculated the Spearman rank correlation between the two access scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the US, the access score was categorized low for 51%, medium for 24%, and high for 25% of census tracts. The Spearman correlation coefficient between these national scores and those with 42-minute driving time was 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a novel TKR care access score that may enhance quality measures available to patients, providers, payors and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Access to specialized orthopedic care is an important determinant of the decision to undergo total knee replacement (TKR); however, most studies have mainly utilized distance to the nearest high-volume hospital as the primary proxy for access. We applied the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to develop a more comprehensive TKR access score that accounts for other potential factors, i.e., supply of and demand for this procedure, that also affect access.

Methods: To apply the 2SFCA method, we first estimated TKR demand using the CDC estimates of prevalence of osteoarthritis, which was multiplied by estimates of patients who would potentially benefit from TKR. We then estimated TKR supply using the number of TKRs performed in each hospital, extracted from the CMS MedPAR database. For the nationwide analysis, we estimated the access score for a radius of 55 km around each census tract in the contiguous US. For a subset of the census tracts, we employed a more realistic but more computationally intensive 42-minute driving distance to determine the robustness of the 55 km assumption, and calculated the Spearman rank correlation between the two access scores.

Results: Across the US, the access score was categorized low for 51%, medium for 24%, and high for 25% of census tracts. The Spearman correlation coefficient between these national scores and those with 42-minute driving time was 0.75.

Conclusions: We developed a novel TKR care access score that may enhance quality measures available to patients, providers, payors and researchers.

为考虑进行全膝关节置换术的骨关节炎患者制定新的手术护理可及性评分。
目的:能否获得专业的骨科医疗服务是决定是否接受全膝关节置换术(TKR)的重要因素;然而,大多数研究主要利用与最近的高流量医院的距离作为获得服务的主要代表。我们采用两步浮动集水区(2SFCA)法制定了更全面的 TKR 可及性评分,该评分考虑了其他可能影响可及性的因素,即该手术的供需情况:为了应用 2SFCA 方法,我们首先使用疾病预防控制中心(CDC)对骨关节炎患病率的估计值来估算 TKR 的需求量,再乘以可能从 TKR 中受益的患者估计值。然后,我们利用从 CMS MedPAR 数据库中提取的每家医院实施的 TKR 数量来估算 TKR 的供应量。在全国范围的分析中,我们估算了美国毗邻地区每个人口普查区周围 55 公里半径内的就医评分。对于部分人口普查区,我们采用了更实际但计算量更大的 42 分钟车程,以确定 55 公里假设的稳健性,并计算了两个就诊评分之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关性:结果:在全美范围内,51% 的人口普查区的交通得分被归类为低,24% 的人口普查区的交通得分被归类为中,25% 的人口普查区的交通得分被归类为高。这些全国性得分与驾车时间为 42 分钟的得分之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为 0.75:我们开发了一种新颖的 TKR 护理可及性评分,可提高患者、医疗服务提供者、支付者和研究人员可用的质量衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信