Barriers to Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of High-Poverty and Low-Poverty Communities.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
J Alex B Gibbons, Insa Mannstadt, Troy Amen, Mangala Rajan, Sarah R Young, Michael L Parks, Mark Figgie, Anne Bass, Linda Russell, Bella Mehta, Iris Navarro-Millán, Susan M Goodman
{"title":"Barriers to Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of High-Poverty and Low-Poverty Communities.","authors":"J Alex B Gibbons, Insa Mannstadt, Troy Amen, Mangala Rajan, Sarah R Young, Michael L Parks, Mark Figgie, Anne Bass, Linda Russell, Bella Mehta, Iris Navarro-Millán, Susan M Goodman","doi":"10.1002/acr.25468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to determine the most significant barriers to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for people living in high-poverty communities relative to low-poverty communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a 21-question survey based on interviews with underrepresented minority patients with osteoarthritis targeting five barriers to TJA: trust in surgeon, recovery concerns, cost / insurance issues, fear of poor surgical outcomes, and timing considerations. Participants rated the importance of each barrier on a 5-point Likert scale, dichotomized into very / extremely important and not as important. The survey was distributed at New York City clinics and nationally through an arthritis advocacy group. We used geocoding to link addresses to census tracts, defining \"high-poverty communities\" as those with ≥20% of residents living below the poverty level. Logistic regression models assessed the association between community poverty status and rating barriers as very / extremely important, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 702 survey participants, 16.8% were residents of high-poverty communities. After adjustment, participants from high-poverty communities were more likely to rate trust in surgeon (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.87 [1.24, 2.82]) and fear of poor surgical outcome (aOR: 1.68 [1.08, 2.61]) as very / extremely important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People from high-poverty communities identified lack of trust in surgeons and fear of poor surgical outcomes as more significant barriers to TJA compared to people from low-poverty communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to determine the most significant barriers to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for people living in high-poverty communities relative to low-poverty communities.

Methods: We created a 21-question survey based on interviews with underrepresented minority patients with osteoarthritis targeting five barriers to TJA: trust in surgeon, recovery concerns, cost / insurance issues, fear of poor surgical outcomes, and timing considerations. Participants rated the importance of each barrier on a 5-point Likert scale, dichotomized into very / extremely important and not as important. The survey was distributed at New York City clinics and nationally through an arthritis advocacy group. We used geocoding to link addresses to census tracts, defining "high-poverty communities" as those with ≥20% of residents living below the poverty level. Logistic regression models assessed the association between community poverty status and rating barriers as very / extremely important, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.

Results: Of the 702 survey participants, 16.8% were residents of high-poverty communities. After adjustment, participants from high-poverty communities were more likely to rate trust in surgeon (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.87 [1.24, 2.82]) and fear of poor surgical outcome (aOR: 1.68 [1.08, 2.61]) as very / extremely important.

Conclusion: People from high-poverty communities identified lack of trust in surgeons and fear of poor surgical outcomes as more significant barriers to TJA compared to people from low-poverty communities.

全关节关节置换术的障碍:高贫困率社区与低贫困率社区的比较。
目的我们的目的是确定与低贫困社区相比,生活在高贫困社区的人在接受全关节置换术(TJA)时遇到的最主要障碍:我们在对代表性不足的少数族裔骨关节炎患者进行访谈的基础上制作了一份包含 21 个问题的调查问卷,调查问卷针对的是 TJA 的五大障碍:对外科医生的信任、对恢复的担忧、费用/保险问题、对手术效果不佳的恐惧以及时间考虑。参与者用 5 分李克特量表对每个障碍的重要性进行评分,分为 "非常/极其重要 "和 "不那么重要"。调查表在纽约市的诊所发放,并通过一个关节炎倡导组织在全国范围内发放。我们使用地理编码将地址与人口普查区联系起来,将 "高贫困社区 "定义为生活在贫困线以下的居民比例≥20%的社区。逻辑回归模型评估了社区贫困状况与将障碍评为 "非常/极其重要 "之间的关联,并对人口和临床因素进行了调整:在 702 名调查参与者中,16.8% 是高度贫困社区的居民。经调整后,来自贫困社区的参与者更有可能将对外科医生的信任(调整后的几率比(aOR):1.87 [1.24, 2.82])和对手术效果不佳的恐惧(aOR:1.68 [1.08, 2.61])评为非常/极其重要:结论:与来自低贫困社区的人相比,来自高贫困社区的人认为对外科医生缺乏信任和担心手术效果不佳是进行 TJA 的更大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信