Determining the optimal time window to detect emerald ash borer damage for effective management.

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Quan Zhou, Xudong Zhang, Linfeng Yu, Ruohan Qi, Lili Ren, Youqing Luo
{"title":"Determining the optimal time window to detect emerald ash borer damage for effective management.","authors":"Quan Zhou, Xudong Zhang, Linfeng Yu, Ruohan Qi, Lili Ren, Youqing Luo","doi":"10.1002/ps.8533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emerald ash borer (EAB) is an invasive pest of global concern. Accurate detection of EAB is crucial for effective management. Traditional field surveys fail to meet large-scale monitoring requirements. Remote sensing methods offer a potential solution, but the phenological decline of ash trees may obscure the remote sensing features for detecting EAB. Therefore, determining the timing of leaf abscission caused by EAB before phenology is crucial for effective detection. We collected time-series data of Leaf Area Index (LAI), leaf sizes, and hyperspectral images of damaged ash trees throughout the growing season to determine the optimal detecting time window for EAB detection using field surveys or remote sensing techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in LAI and leaf size were observed throughout the growing season among ash trees with different EAB infestation degrees, providing a basis for small-scale field surveys. However, in May and June, the hyperspectral reflectance showed no variation. The difference began to appear in July and became apparent from August to October. By October, severely EAB-infested ash trees had almost completely defoliated. Machine learning classification results showed that accuracies after July were higher than before July. After July, the highest classification accuracy reached 100%, while the highest accuracy before July was only 88.57%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selecting the optimal monitoring time significantly enhanced detection accuracy. The optimal period for field surveys is from May to November, whereas for remote sensing it is from August to October. Identifying the optimal months enables us to achieve more efficient decision-making and management. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8533","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emerald ash borer (EAB) is an invasive pest of global concern. Accurate detection of EAB is crucial for effective management. Traditional field surveys fail to meet large-scale monitoring requirements. Remote sensing methods offer a potential solution, but the phenological decline of ash trees may obscure the remote sensing features for detecting EAB. Therefore, determining the timing of leaf abscission caused by EAB before phenology is crucial for effective detection. We collected time-series data of Leaf Area Index (LAI), leaf sizes, and hyperspectral images of damaged ash trees throughout the growing season to determine the optimal detecting time window for EAB detection using field surveys or remote sensing techniques.

Results: Significant differences in LAI and leaf size were observed throughout the growing season among ash trees with different EAB infestation degrees, providing a basis for small-scale field surveys. However, in May and June, the hyperspectral reflectance showed no variation. The difference began to appear in July and became apparent from August to October. By October, severely EAB-infested ash trees had almost completely defoliated. Machine learning classification results showed that accuracies after July were higher than before July. After July, the highest classification accuracy reached 100%, while the highest accuracy before July was only 88.57%.

Conclusions: Selecting the optimal monitoring time significantly enhanced detection accuracy. The optimal period for field surveys is from May to November, whereas for remote sensing it is from August to October. Identifying the optimal months enables us to achieve more efficient decision-making and management. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract Image

确定检测白蜡螟危害的最佳时间窗口,以便进行有效管理。
背景:白蜡树蛀虫(EAB)是一种全球关注的入侵害虫。准确检测 EAB 对有效管理至关重要。传统的实地调查无法满足大规模监测的要求。遥感方法提供了一个潜在的解决方案,但白蜡树的物候衰退可能会掩盖检测 EAB 的遥感特征。因此,在物候期之前确定 EAB 引起的叶片脱落时间对于有效检测至关重要。我们在整个生长季节收集了叶面积指数(LAI)、叶片大小和受损白蜡树的高光谱图像的时间序列数据,以确定使用实地调查或遥感技术检测 EAB 的最佳检测时间窗口:结果:在整个生长季节,不同 EAB 侵染程度的白蜡树的 LAI 和叶片大小存在显著差异,为小规模实地调查提供了依据。然而,在 5 月和 6 月,高光谱反射率没有显示出任何变化。七月开始出现差异,八月到十月变得明显。到 10 月份,受 EAB 严重侵染的白蜡树几乎完全落叶。机器学习分类结果显示,7 月之后的分类准确率高于 7 月之前。7 月后,最高分类准确率达到 100%,而 7 月前的最高准确率仅为 88.57%:结论:选择最佳监测时间可显著提高检测准确率。结论:选择最佳监测时间大大提高了检测精度。实地调查的最佳监测时间是 5 月至 11 月,而遥感监测的最佳监测时间是 8 月至 10 月。确定最佳监测月份能让我们更有效地进行决策和管理。© 2024 化学工业协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信