Coupled Perturbed Approach to Dual Basis Sets for Molecules and Solids. II: Energy and Band Corrections for Periodic Systems.

IF 2.7 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A Pub Date : 2024-11-21 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04321
Lorenzo Maschio, Bernard Kirtman
{"title":"Coupled Perturbed Approach to Dual Basis Sets for Molecules and Solids. II: Energy and Band Corrections for Periodic Systems.","authors":"Lorenzo Maschio, Bernard Kirtman","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When trying to reach convergence of quantum chemical calculations toward the complete basis set limit, crystalline solids generally prove to be more challenging than molecules. This is due both to the closer packing of atoms─hence, to linear dependencies─and to the problematic behavior of Ewald techniques used for dealing with the infinite character of Coulomb sums. Thus, a dual basis set approach is even more desirable for periodic systems than for molecules. In such an approach, the self-consistent procedure is implemented in a small basis set, and the effect of the enlargement of the basis set is estimated <i>a posteriori</i>. In this paper, we extend to crystalline solids our previous coupled perturbed dual basis set approach [<i>J. Chem. Theory Comput.</i> <b>2020</b>, <i>16</i>, 1, 340-353] in which the basis set enlargement is treated as a perturbation. Among the notable features of this approach are (i) the possibility of obtaining not only a correction to the energy but also to energy bands and electron density; (ii) the absence of a diagonalization step for the full Fock matrix in the large basis set; and (iii) the possibility of extrapolating low order perturbation energy corrections to infinite order. We also present here the first periodic implementation of the dual basis set method of Liang and Head-Gordon [<i>J. Phys. Chem. A</i> <b>2004</b>, <i>108</i>, 3206-3210]. The effectiveness of both approaches is, then, compared on a small, but representative, set of solids.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":" ","pages":"10020-10028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When trying to reach convergence of quantum chemical calculations toward the complete basis set limit, crystalline solids generally prove to be more challenging than molecules. This is due both to the closer packing of atoms─hence, to linear dependencies─and to the problematic behavior of Ewald techniques used for dealing with the infinite character of Coulomb sums. Thus, a dual basis set approach is even more desirable for periodic systems than for molecules. In such an approach, the self-consistent procedure is implemented in a small basis set, and the effect of the enlargement of the basis set is estimated a posteriori. In this paper, we extend to crystalline solids our previous coupled perturbed dual basis set approach [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 1, 340-353] in which the basis set enlargement is treated as a perturbation. Among the notable features of this approach are (i) the possibility of obtaining not only a correction to the energy but also to energy bands and electron density; (ii) the absence of a diagonalization step for the full Fock matrix in the large basis set; and (iii) the possibility of extrapolating low order perturbation energy corrections to infinite order. We also present here the first periodic implementation of the dual basis set method of Liang and Head-Gordon [J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 3206-3210]. The effectiveness of both approaches is, then, compared on a small, but representative, set of solids.

分子和固体的双基集耦合扰动法。II:周期系统的能量和带校正。
在试图使量子化学计算向完全基集极限收敛时,晶体固体通常比分子更具挑战性。这既是由于原子的堆积更为紧密--因此存在线性依赖关系--也是由于用于处理库仑和的无限性的埃瓦尔德技术的行为存在问题。因此,与分子相比,周期系统更需要双基集方法。在这种方法中,自洽程序是在一个较小的基集中实现的,而扩大基集的影响是事后估计的。在本文中,我们将之前的耦合扰动双基集方法扩展到晶体固体[J. Chem. Theory Comput.这种方法的显著特点包括:(i) 不仅可以获得能量修正,还可以获得能带和电子密度修正;(ii) 无需对大基集中的全福克矩阵进行对角化处理;(iii) 可以将低阶扰动能量修正外推至无穷阶。我们还在此介绍了梁和海德-戈登(Liang and Head-Gordon)[J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 3206-3210]的双基集方法的首次周期性实现。然后,我们在一小部分具有代表性的固体集合上比较了这两种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信