Measuring Outcomes Relevant to the Decolletage from the Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of the BODY-Q Decolletage Scale.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Andrea L Pusic, Manraj Kaur
{"title":"Measuring Outcomes Relevant to the Decolletage from the Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of the BODY-Q Decolletage Scale.","authors":"Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Andrea L Pusic, Manraj Kaur","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A range of cosmetic treatments to improve skin quality of the decolletage are available. To measure outcomes from the patient perspective, a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate the BODY-Q Decolletage scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Appearance-related codes from BODY-Q concept elicitation interviews were reexamined and 13 items drafted and refined through patients and clinician debriefing interviews. The scale was tested in an online international sample of women >25 years who had previously received a treatment for the decolletage, or in the past 12 months had received a cosmetic treatment at a plastic surgery or dermatology clinic. Data were analysed with both Rasch measurement theory and classical test theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews conducted with 15 patients and 5 clinicians led to a 16-item scale with items that covered scenarios (mirror, photos, low neckline, lay on side, breasts together, arms crossed, get up, up close), compared (other people), age (youthful, age), qualitative (attractive, healthy), color (even-colored) and texture (smooth, texture). The field-test included 334 participants. An item with poor fit to the Rasch model was dropped. Data for the remaining 15 items fit the Rasch model (Chi-square=76.72, df=60, p=0.07). All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit. All reliability statistics were >0.93. A total of 19 of 20 pre-defined hypotheses (95%) were met providing evidence of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Decolletage scale is available to incorporate the perspective of patients into clinical care and clinical trials of minimally invasive treatments to improve skin quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A range of cosmetic treatments to improve skin quality of the decolletage are available. To measure outcomes from the patient perspective, a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure is needed.

Objectives: To develop and validate the BODY-Q Decolletage scale.

Methods: Appearance-related codes from BODY-Q concept elicitation interviews were reexamined and 13 items drafted and refined through patients and clinician debriefing interviews. The scale was tested in an online international sample of women >25 years who had previously received a treatment for the decolletage, or in the past 12 months had received a cosmetic treatment at a plastic surgery or dermatology clinic. Data were analysed with both Rasch measurement theory and classical test theory.

Results: Interviews conducted with 15 patients and 5 clinicians led to a 16-item scale with items that covered scenarios (mirror, photos, low neckline, lay on side, breasts together, arms crossed, get up, up close), compared (other people), age (youthful, age), qualitative (attractive, healthy), color (even-colored) and texture (smooth, texture). The field-test included 334 participants. An item with poor fit to the Rasch model was dropped. Data for the remaining 15 items fit the Rasch model (Chi-square=76.72, df=60, p=0.07). All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit. All reliability statistics were >0.93. A total of 19 of 20 pre-defined hypotheses (95%) were met providing evidence of construct validity.

Conclusions: The Decolletage scale is available to incorporate the perspective of patients into clinical care and clinical trials of minimally invasive treatments to improve skin quality.

从患者角度衡量与胸部下垂有关的结果:BODY-Q 十褶量表的开发与验证。
背景:目前有一系列改善肩部皮肤质量的美容疗法。为了从患者的角度衡量治疗效果,需要一个严格制定的患者报告结果衡量标准:开发并验证 BODY-Q 十肩部量表:方法:重新审查 BODY-Q 概念激发访谈中与外貌相关的代码,并通过患者和临床医生汇报访谈起草和完善了 13 个项目。该量表在一个在线国际样本中进行了测试,样本年龄大于 25 岁,曾接受过法令纹治疗,或在过去 12 个月中在整形外科或皮肤科诊所接受过美容治疗。采用拉施测量理论和经典测试理论对数据进行了分析:通过对 15 名患者和 5 名临床医生进行访谈,得出了一个包含 16 个项目的量表,其中包括场景(镜子、照片、低领口、侧卧、双乳并拢、双臂交叉、起身、近距离)、比较(其他人)、年龄(年轻、年龄)、质量(有吸引力、健康)、颜色(均匀色)和质地(光滑、质地)。有 334 人参加了实地测试。一个与 Rasch 模型拟合度较低的项目被删除。其余 15 个项目的数据均符合 Rasch 模型(Chi-square=76.72,df=60,p=0.07)。所有项目都具有有序阈值和良好的项目拟合度。所有信度统计均大于 0.93。在 20 个预先设定的假设中,共有 19 个(95%)得到了满足,这提供了构建效度的证据:法令纹量表可用于将患者的观点纳入微创治疗的临床护理和临床试验中,以改善皮肤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信