Four-month real-life response to Tezepelumab in patients with multi-failure to other biologics.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Allergologia et immunopathologia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.15586/aei.v52i6.1161
Diana Betancor, Sara Bautista, Raquel López-Rodríguez, Marcela Valverde-Monge, Mar Fernández-Nieto, Manuel J Rial
{"title":"Four-month real-life response to Tezepelumab in patients with multi-failure to other biologics.","authors":"Diana Betancor, Sara Bautista, Raquel López-Rodríguez, Marcela Valverde-Monge, Mar Fernández-Nieto, Manuel J Rial","doi":"10.15586/aei.v52i6.1161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the response to Tezepelumab in real clinical practice, we performed an analysis of the clinical, functional, and inflammatory characteristics of 13 patients with severe asthma after completing four doses of Tezepelumab was performed. When comparing clinical parameters such as asthma control test (ACT), FENO value, exacerbations in the last 4 months, blood eosinophils and FEV1%, before receiving Tezepelumab and after four doses of Tezepelumab, statistically significant differences were found in ACT levels (p=0.0072), exacerbations (p=0.018) and FEV1% (p=0.012) before and after four doses of Tezepelumab. No statistically significant differences were found in blood eosinophils or FeNO levels, however, a mean reduction of 102.5±231 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> and 14.67±30 ppb, respectively, was observed. Patients with a high T2 profile had significantly higher baseline FeNO (p<0.05), but no significant improvement in lung function or asthma control was observed in this group. Patients with Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were evaluated separately. There was no difference in ACT, FeNO, or lung function changes after tezepelumab use compared to patients without AERD (all p>0.05). We demonstrated, in a multicenter study, the clinical improvement associated with tezepelumab treatment in severe uncontrolled asthma, independent of inflammatory biomarkers, eosinophilic profile, or previous biological failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7536,"journal":{"name":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","volume":"52 6","pages":"76-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/aei.v52i6.1161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the response to Tezepelumab in real clinical practice, we performed an analysis of the clinical, functional, and inflammatory characteristics of 13 patients with severe asthma after completing four doses of Tezepelumab was performed. When comparing clinical parameters such as asthma control test (ACT), FENO value, exacerbations in the last 4 months, blood eosinophils and FEV1%, before receiving Tezepelumab and after four doses of Tezepelumab, statistically significant differences were found in ACT levels (p=0.0072), exacerbations (p=0.018) and FEV1% (p=0.012) before and after four doses of Tezepelumab. No statistically significant differences were found in blood eosinophils or FeNO levels, however, a mean reduction of 102.5±231 cells/mm3 and 14.67±30 ppb, respectively, was observed. Patients with a high T2 profile had significantly higher baseline FeNO (p<0.05), but no significant improvement in lung function or asthma control was observed in this group. Patients with Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) were evaluated separately. There was no difference in ACT, FeNO, or lung function changes after tezepelumab use compared to patients without AERD (all p>0.05). We demonstrated, in a multicenter study, the clinical improvement associated with tezepelumab treatment in severe uncontrolled asthma, independent of inflammatory biomarkers, eosinophilic profile, or previous biological failure.

对其他生物制剂治疗多次失败的患者使用特珠单抗四个月后的实际反应。
为了评估在实际临床实践中对替塞普鲁单抗的反应,我们对 13 名重症哮喘患者在完成四次替塞普鲁单抗治疗后的临床、功能和炎症特征进行了分析。在比较接受特珠单抗治疗前和四剂特珠单抗治疗后的哮喘控制测试(ACT)、FENO值、最近4个月的病情加重情况、血液嗜酸性粒细胞和FEV1%等临床参数时发现,四剂特珠单抗治疗前后的ACT水平(p=0.0072)、病情加重情况(p=0.018)和FEV1%(p=0.012)在统计学上存在显著差异。血液中的嗜酸性粒细胞或 FeNO 水平没有发现有统计学意义的差异,但平均分别减少了 102.5±231 cells/mm3 和 14.67±30 ppb。高 T2 患者的基线 FeNO 水平明显更高(P0.05)。在一项多中心研究中,我们证实了替塞普鲁单抗治疗重度未控制哮喘可改善临床症状,且不受炎症生物标志物、嗜酸性粒细胞特征或既往生物治疗失败的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Professor A. Oehling, Allergologia et Immunopathologia is a forum for those working in the field of pediatric asthma, allergy and immunology. Manuscripts related to clinical, epidemiological and experimental allergy and immunopathology related to childhood will be considered for publication. Allergologia et Immunopathologia is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP) and also of the Latin American Society of Immunodeficiencies (LASID). It has and independent international Editorial Committee which submits received papers for peer-reviewing by international experts. The journal accepts original and review articles from all over the world, together with consensus statements from the aforementioned societies. Occasionally, the opinion of an expert on a burning topic is published in the "Point of View" section. Letters to the Editor on previously published papers are welcomed. Allergologia et Immunopathologia publishes 6 issues per year and is included in the major databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信