Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine in children.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Allergologia et immunopathologia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.15586/aei.v52i6.1171
Luis Moral, Alicia Moral, Laura Murcia, Nuria Marco
{"title":"Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine in children.","authors":"Luis Moral, Alicia Moral, Laura Murcia, Nuria Marco","doi":"10.15586/aei.v52i6.1171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine is rare in children. The usefulness of different diagnostic tests for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to describe a case series of children with hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine and to compare the results of different diagnostic tests.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Nine children with hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine were included. Only six of these children and their parents consented to a comprehensive allergy assessment, which included the prick test, intradermal test, patch test, and repeated open application test (ROAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven children (78%) presented symptoms of chlorhexidine hypersensitivity within the first 5 years of life; two of them before the age of 1 year. In four children, the dermatitis lesions were suggestive of wound superinfection. All six children who participated in the comprehensive diagnostic evaluation had negative results on the prick test. The immediate-reading intradermal test was positive in one case and uncertain in two cases. The patch test was positive in five cases, and the ROAT was positive in all six cases when using 2% chlorhexidine alcohol solution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACD to chlorhexidine in children appears to be rare and can be difficult to detect. Clinicians should consider this diagnosis when wounds worsen with chlorhexidine. Although the patch test is the most standardized method for detecting ACD, the ROAT with 2% chlorhexidine alcohol solution was the most sensitive test in our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7536,"journal":{"name":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","volume":"52 6","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/aei.v52i6.1171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine is rare in children. The usefulness of different diagnostic tests for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is unknown.

Objective: We aim to describe a case series of children with hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine and to compare the results of different diagnostic tests.

Patients: Nine children with hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine were included. Only six of these children and their parents consented to a comprehensive allergy assessment, which included the prick test, intradermal test, patch test, and repeated open application test (ROAT).

Results: Seven children (78%) presented symptoms of chlorhexidine hypersensitivity within the first 5 years of life; two of them before the age of 1 year. In four children, the dermatitis lesions were suggestive of wound superinfection. All six children who participated in the comprehensive diagnostic evaluation had negative results on the prick test. The immediate-reading intradermal test was positive in one case and uncertain in two cases. The patch test was positive in five cases, and the ROAT was positive in all six cases when using 2% chlorhexidine alcohol solution.

Conclusion: ACD to chlorhexidine in children appears to be rare and can be difficult to detect. Clinicians should consider this diagnosis when wounds worsen with chlorhexidine. Although the patch test is the most standardized method for detecting ACD, the ROAT with 2% chlorhexidine alcohol solution was the most sensitive test in our patients.

儿童对洗必泰的过敏性接触性皮炎。
背景:儿童对洗必泰过敏的情况很少见。过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的不同诊断测试的作用尚不清楚:我们旨在描述一组对洗必泰过敏的儿童病例,并比较不同诊断测试的结果:患者:共纳入九名对洗必泰过敏的儿童。其中只有六名儿童及其家长同意接受全面的过敏评估,包括点刺试验、皮内试验、斑贴试验和重复开放涂抹试验(ROAT):7名儿童(78%)在出生后5年内出现洗必泰过敏症状,其中2名儿童在1岁前就出现了过敏症状。其中四名儿童的皮炎病变提示为伤口超级感染。参加综合诊断评估的所有 6 名儿童的皮刺试验结果均为阴性。皮内即时读取试验有一例呈阳性,两例不确定。使用 2% 洗必泰酒精溶液进行斑贴试验时,有五例呈阳性反应,而 ROAT 试验则在所有六例中均呈阳性反应:结论:儿童对洗必泰的过敏性皮炎似乎很罕见,而且很难发现。临床医生在使用洗必泰导致伤口恶化时应考虑这一诊断。虽然斑贴试验是检测 ACD 的最标准方法,但在我们的患者中,用 2% 洗必泰酒精溶液进行 ROAT 试验是最灵敏的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Professor A. Oehling, Allergologia et Immunopathologia is a forum for those working in the field of pediatric asthma, allergy and immunology. Manuscripts related to clinical, epidemiological and experimental allergy and immunopathology related to childhood will be considered for publication. Allergologia et Immunopathologia is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP) and also of the Latin American Society of Immunodeficiencies (LASID). It has and independent international Editorial Committee which submits received papers for peer-reviewing by international experts. The journal accepts original and review articles from all over the world, together with consensus statements from the aforementioned societies. Occasionally, the opinion of an expert on a burning topic is published in the "Point of View" section. Letters to the Editor on previously published papers are welcomed. Allergologia et Immunopathologia publishes 6 issues per year and is included in the major databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信