Effectiveness of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography combined with neuron-specific enolase level in predicting neonatal brain injury and prognosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/IXFJ7762
Xiaomeng Zhang, Guanghua Dai, Kun Li
{"title":"Effectiveness of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography combined with neuron-specific enolase level in predicting neonatal brain injury and prognosis.","authors":"Xiaomeng Zhang, Guanghua Dai, Kun Li","doi":"10.62347/IXFJ7762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the value of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) combined with neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of neonatal brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 94 neonates with brain injury and 90 neonates without, admitted to Baoji Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital between September 2022 and February 2024, were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between aEEG score, NSE level, and Neurobehavioral Neurological Assay (NBNA) score was analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis. Independent factors affecting the prognosis of the neonates were identified by unifactorial and multifactorial analyses, and the predictive value was assessed using ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aEEG score was significantly lower while the NSE level was considerably higher in newborns with brain injury compared to those without (both P<0.001). aEEG score was positively correlated with the NBNA score (r=0.718, P<0.001), NSE level was negatively correlated with NBNA score (r=-0.785, P<0.001), and aEEG score was negatively correlated with NSE level (r=-0.749, P<0.001). The aEEG score and NSE level demonstrated good predictive value for neonatal brain injury, with AUC values of 0.903 and 0.897, respectively. The AUC of combined assessment was 0.917. Multifactorial analysis showed that intrauterine distress (OR: 3.385, 95% CI: 1.033-11.903, P=0.048) and higher NSE level (OR: 1.516, 95% CI: 1.117-2.136, P=0.011) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of neonates with brain injury, while higher aEEG scores (OR: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.370-0.884, P=0.015) was an independent protective factor. Intrauterine distress, aEEG score, and NSE predicted poor prognostic outcomes with AUCs of 0.639, 0.809, and 0.827, and the combined diagnosis had an AUC of 0.871.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aEEG combined with NSE level can effectively predict neonatal brain injury and prognosis, providing a valuable reference for early diagnosis and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IXFJ7762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) combined with neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of neonatal brain injury.

Methods: Clinical data from 94 neonates with brain injury and 90 neonates without, admitted to Baoji Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital between September 2022 and February 2024, were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between aEEG score, NSE level, and Neurobehavioral Neurological Assay (NBNA) score was analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis. Independent factors affecting the prognosis of the neonates were identified by unifactorial and multifactorial analyses, and the predictive value was assessed using ROC curves.

Results: The aEEG score was significantly lower while the NSE level was considerably higher in newborns with brain injury compared to those without (both P<0.001). aEEG score was positively correlated with the NBNA score (r=0.718, P<0.001), NSE level was negatively correlated with NBNA score (r=-0.785, P<0.001), and aEEG score was negatively correlated with NSE level (r=-0.749, P<0.001). The aEEG score and NSE level demonstrated good predictive value for neonatal brain injury, with AUC values of 0.903 and 0.897, respectively. The AUC of combined assessment was 0.917. Multifactorial analysis showed that intrauterine distress (OR: 3.385, 95% CI: 1.033-11.903, P=0.048) and higher NSE level (OR: 1.516, 95% CI: 1.117-2.136, P=0.011) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of neonates with brain injury, while higher aEEG scores (OR: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.370-0.884, P=0.015) was an independent protective factor. Intrauterine distress, aEEG score, and NSE predicted poor prognostic outcomes with AUCs of 0.639, 0.809, and 0.827, and the combined diagnosis had an AUC of 0.871.

Conclusion: aEEG combined with NSE level can effectively predict neonatal brain injury and prognosis, providing a valuable reference for early diagnosis and intervention.

振幅积分脑电图结合神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平在预测新生儿脑损伤和预后方面的有效性。
目的研究振幅积分脑电图(aEEG)联合神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在新生儿脑损伤诊断和预后评估中的应用价值:回顾性分析2022年9月至2024年2月期间宝鸡市妇幼保健院收治的94例新生儿脑损伤和90例新生儿无脑损伤的临床资料。通过皮尔逊相关分析法分析了脑电图评分、NSE水平和神经行为学神经学测定(NBNA)评分之间的关系。通过单因素和多因素分析确定了影响新生儿预后的独立因素,并利用 ROC 曲线评估了预测价值:结果:与无脑损伤新生儿相比,有脑损伤新生儿的 aEEG 评分明显较低,而 NSE 水平则明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信