Considering different Montreal Cognitive Assessment cutoff scores for older adults with asthma.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Gali Moritz, Jacqueline H Becker, Jyoti V Ankam, Kimberly Arcoleo, Matthew Wysocki, Roee Holtzer, Juan Wisnivesky, Paula J Busse, Alex D Federman, Sunit P Jariwala, Jonathan M Feldman
{"title":"Considering different Montreal Cognitive Assessment cutoff scores for older adults with asthma.","authors":"Gali Moritz, Jacqueline H Becker, Jyoti V Ankam, Kimberly Arcoleo, Matthew Wysocki, Roee Holtzer, Juan Wisnivesky, Paula J Busse, Alex D Federman, Sunit P Jariwala, Jonathan M Feldman","doi":"10.2500/aap.2024.45.240045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is a greater prevalence of cognitive impairment among ethnic and/or racial minorities, and cognitive impairment is a barrier to asthma self-management (SM) behaviors and outcomes in older adults. <b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between cognitive impairment, assessed by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and asthma SM behaviors and outcomes in a sample of predominantly Black and Latino participants. In addition, we evaluated whether using two different MoCA cutoff scores influenced the association between cognitive impairment and asthma outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Baseline cross-sectional data were extracted from a longitudinal study of older adults with asthma (N = 165) ages ≥60 years. Cognition was assessed by using the MoCA. Asthma Control Questionnaire, asthma-related quality of life (AQOL), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence were assessed by using self-report. ICS dosing was collected through chart review and inhaler technique was observed and rated. <b>Results:</b> Using established MoCA cutoff scores of 23 and 26 yielded 45% and 74% cognitive impairment rates, respectively. Cognitive impairment, defined by using the cutoff score of 23, was significantly associated with worse asthma control (p = 0.04) and worse ICS adherence (p = 0.01). With a cutoff score of 26, only AQOL was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (p = 0.03). Race and/or ethnicity moderated the relationship between cognitive impairment and asthma control with a MoCA cutoff score of 23, and between cognitive impairment and AQOL with a MoCA cutoff score of 26. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cognitive impairment in older adults with asthma is associated with important clinical outcomes, but this relationship is influenced by the cutoff score used to define cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"45 6","pages":"e72-e80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2024.45.240045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a greater prevalence of cognitive impairment among ethnic and/or racial minorities, and cognitive impairment is a barrier to asthma self-management (SM) behaviors and outcomes in older adults. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between cognitive impairment, assessed by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and asthma SM behaviors and outcomes in a sample of predominantly Black and Latino participants. In addition, we evaluated whether using two different MoCA cutoff scores influenced the association between cognitive impairment and asthma outcomes. Methods: Baseline cross-sectional data were extracted from a longitudinal study of older adults with asthma (N = 165) ages ≥60 years. Cognition was assessed by using the MoCA. Asthma Control Questionnaire, asthma-related quality of life (AQOL), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence were assessed by using self-report. ICS dosing was collected through chart review and inhaler technique was observed and rated. Results: Using established MoCA cutoff scores of 23 and 26 yielded 45% and 74% cognitive impairment rates, respectively. Cognitive impairment, defined by using the cutoff score of 23, was significantly associated with worse asthma control (p = 0.04) and worse ICS adherence (p = 0.01). With a cutoff score of 26, only AQOL was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (p = 0.03). Race and/or ethnicity moderated the relationship between cognitive impairment and asthma control with a MoCA cutoff score of 23, and between cognitive impairment and AQOL with a MoCA cutoff score of 26. Conclusion: Cognitive impairment in older adults with asthma is associated with important clinical outcomes, but this relationship is influenced by the cutoff score used to define cognitive impairment.

考虑对患有哮喘的老年人采用不同的蒙特利尔认知评估截断分数。
背景:认知障碍在少数族裔和/或种族中更为普遍,认知障碍是老年人哮喘自我管理(SM)行为和结果的障碍。研究目的本研究旨在通过使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)来评估认知障碍与哮喘自我管理行为和结果之间的关系,研究对象主要是黑人和拉丁裔参与者。此外,我们还评估了使用两种不同的 MoCA 临界分数是否会影响认知障碍与哮喘结果之间的关系。研究方法我们从一项针对年龄≥60 岁的哮喘老年人(N = 165)的纵向研究中提取了基线横断面数据。认知能力通过 MoCA 进行评估。哮喘控制问卷、哮喘相关生活质量(AQOL)和吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)依从性通过自我报告进行评估。通过病历审查收集 ICS 剂量,并对吸入器技术进行观察和评分。结果使用已确定的 MoCA 临界分数 23 分和 26 分,认知障碍率分别为 45% 和 74%。截断分数为 23 分时,认知障碍与哮喘控制较差(p = 0.04)和 ICS 依从性较差(p = 0.01)显著相关。以 26 分为临界值时,只有 AQOL 与认知障碍有显著相关性(p = 0.03)。当 MoCA 临界值为 23 分时,种族和/或民族可调节认知功能障碍与哮喘控制之间的关系;当 MoCA 临界值为 26 分时,认知功能障碍与 AQOL 之间的关系。结论患有哮喘的老年人的认知功能障碍与重要的临床结果有关,但这种关系受到用于定义认知功能障碍的临界值的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信