Hydrogen and Solid Carbon Production via Methane Pyrolysis in a Rotating Gliding Arc Plasma Reactor.

IF 7.5 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ChemSusChem Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/cssc.202401602
Dae Hoon Lee, Zulfiqar Ali, Hohyun Song, Uyen Nhat Trieu Nguyen, Hyung Cheoul Shim, Seung-Mo Lee, Muhammad Majeed
{"title":"Hydrogen and Solid Carbon Production via Methane Pyrolysis in a Rotating Gliding Arc Plasma Reactor.","authors":"Dae Hoon Lee, Zulfiqar Ali, Hohyun Song, Uyen Nhat Trieu Nguyen, Hyung Cheoul Shim, Seung-Mo Lee, Muhammad Majeed","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202401602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma-induced methane pyrolysis is a promising hydrogen production method. However, few studies have focused the decomposition of pure methane as a discharge gas. Herein, a rotating gliding arc reactor was used for the conversion of methane (discharge gas and feedstock) into hydrogen and solid carbon. Methane conversion, gaseous product selectivity, and energy usage efficiency(specific energy requirement for hydrogen production(SER)) were investigated as functions of operating parameters, e.g., specific energy input(SEI), residence time, and reactor design. SEI was positively(almost linearly) correlated with methane conversion and hydrogen yield and negatively correlated with SER. Conversion and efficiency of energy usage increased when reactor designs providing higher thermal densities were used. With the increasing flow rate of methane at constant SEI, the reaction volume and, hence, the residence time of the gas inside the reaction zone increased, which resulted in methane conversion and hydrogen selectivity enhancement. The solid carbon featured four distinct domains, namely graphitic carbon, turbostratic carbon, few-layer graphene, and amorphous carbon, which indicated a nonuniform temperature distribution in the reaction zone. But it seems that graphitic carbon dominates amorhphous one. This study highlights the potential of rotating gliding arc plasma systems for efficient methane conversion into hydrogen and valuable solid carbon products.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e202401602"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202401602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma-induced methane pyrolysis is a promising hydrogen production method. However, few studies have focused the decomposition of pure methane as a discharge gas. Herein, a rotating gliding arc reactor was used for the conversion of methane (discharge gas and feedstock) into hydrogen and solid carbon. Methane conversion, gaseous product selectivity, and energy usage efficiency(specific energy requirement for hydrogen production(SER)) were investigated as functions of operating parameters, e.g., specific energy input(SEI), residence time, and reactor design. SEI was positively(almost linearly) correlated with methane conversion and hydrogen yield and negatively correlated with SER. Conversion and efficiency of energy usage increased when reactor designs providing higher thermal densities were used. With the increasing flow rate of methane at constant SEI, the reaction volume and, hence, the residence time of the gas inside the reaction zone increased, which resulted in methane conversion and hydrogen selectivity enhancement. The solid carbon featured four distinct domains, namely graphitic carbon, turbostratic carbon, few-layer graphene, and amorphous carbon, which indicated a nonuniform temperature distribution in the reaction zone. But it seems that graphitic carbon dominates amorhphous one. This study highlights the potential of rotating gliding arc plasma systems for efficient methane conversion into hydrogen and valuable solid carbon products.

在旋转滑动电弧等离子体反应器中通过甲烷热解生产氢气和固体碳。
等离子体诱导甲烷热解是一种前景广阔的制氢方法。然而,很少有研究关注纯甲烷作为放电气体的分解。本文采用旋转滑弧式反应器将甲烷(放电气体和原料)转化为氢气和固态碳。研究了甲烷转化率、气态产品选择性和能源利用效率(制氢的特定能源需求(SER))与操作参数(如特定能源输入(SEI)、停留时间和反应器设计)的函数关系。SEI 与甲烷转化率和产氢量呈正相关(几乎呈线性关系),而与 SER 呈负相关。当反应器设计提供较高的热密度时,转化率和能源使用效率都会提高。在 SEI 保持不变的情况下,随着甲烷流量的增加,反应体积以及气体在反应区内的停留时间也随之增加,从而提高了甲烷转化率和氢气选择性。固体碳有四个不同的领域,即石墨碳、湍流碳、少层石墨烯和无定形碳,这表明反应区的温度分布不均匀。但似乎石墨碳在无定形碳中占主导地位。这项研究凸显了旋转滑弧等离子体系统将甲烷高效转化为氢气和有价值的固态碳产品的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ChemSusChem
ChemSusChem 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ChemSusChem Impact Factor (2016): 7.226 Scope: Interdisciplinary journal Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability Features the best research on sustainability and energy Areas Covered: Chemistry Materials Science Chemical Engineering Biotechnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信