Laryngopharyngeal reflux: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare physicians.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sultan Bin Obaid, Shahad Bin Obaid, Mohammed Mesfer Alessa, Mohammed Alnajeim, Rakan Almetary, Khalid H Malki, Tamer Mesallam, Daniele Farneti, Mohamed Farahat
{"title":"Laryngopharyngeal reflux: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare physicians.","authors":"Sultan Bin Obaid, Shahad Bin Obaid, Mohammed Mesfer Alessa, Mohammed Alnajeim, Rakan Almetary, Khalid H Malki, Tamer Mesallam, Daniele Farneti, Mohamed Farahat","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-N2776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) among primary healthcare (PHC) physicians in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quantitative cross-sectional study used an online-based questionnaire distributed to physicians in PHC facilities and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of four sections that provided data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 473 physicians included in the study, one-third were unaware of LPR, and two-thirds were unfamiliar with the reflux symptom index (RSI). The most common sources of LPR knowledge were textbooks and literature (49.8%). The most recognised risk factor, symptom, and complication were high body mass index (75.8%), voice problems (82.4%), and laryngeal cancer (70.6%), respectively. The most recognised diagnostic and treatment options were laryngoscopy (73.5%) and lifestyle modifications (87.3%), respectively, while only 60.4% of participants recognised proton pump inhibitors as a treatment option. Most PHC physicians believed that LPR is underdiagnosed and that primary prevention and awareness among the general population need to be improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in three PHC physicians knew nothing about LPR, and two in three were unfamiliar with the RSI. More than half could not recognise all major symptoms of LPR, which might be a cause for concern, as recognising these symptoms is crucial for proper diagnosis. We recommend increasing the education of physicians about LPR, its signs and symptoms, and the RSI, all of which provide valuable clues for diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"44 5","pages":"306-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2776","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) among primary healthcare (PHC) physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This quantitative cross-sectional study used an online-based questionnaire distributed to physicians in PHC facilities and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of four sections that provided data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results: Of the 473 physicians included in the study, one-third were unaware of LPR, and two-thirds were unfamiliar with the reflux symptom index (RSI). The most common sources of LPR knowledge were textbooks and literature (49.8%). The most recognised risk factor, symptom, and complication were high body mass index (75.8%), voice problems (82.4%), and laryngeal cancer (70.6%), respectively. The most recognised diagnostic and treatment options were laryngoscopy (73.5%) and lifestyle modifications (87.3%), respectively, while only 60.4% of participants recognised proton pump inhibitors as a treatment option. Most PHC physicians believed that LPR is underdiagnosed and that primary prevention and awareness among the general population need to be improved.

Conclusions: One in three PHC physicians knew nothing about LPR, and two in three were unfamiliar with the RSI. More than half could not recognise all major symptoms of LPR, which might be a cause for concern, as recognising these symptoms is crucial for proper diagnosis. We recommend increasing the education of physicians about LPR, its signs and symptoms, and the RSI, all of which provide valuable clues for diagnosis.

喉咽反流:初级保健医生的知识、态度和做法。
目的:本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯初级卫生保健(PHC)医生对喉咽反流(LPR)的认识水平、态度和做法:本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯初级卫生保健(PHC)医生对喉咽反流(LPR)的认识水平、态度和做法:这项定量横断面研究使用了一份在线问卷,发放给沙特阿拉伯初级保健机构和医院的医生。问卷由四个部分组成,提供了人口统计学、知识、态度和实践方面的数据:结果:在参与研究的 473 名医生中,有三分之一的人不了解 LPR,三分之二的人不熟悉反流症状指数 (RSI)。最常见的 LPR 知识来源是教科书和文献(49.8%)。最受认可的风险因素、症状和并发症分别是体重指数高(75.8%)、嗓音问题(82.4%)和喉癌(70.6%)。最被认可的诊断和治疗方法分别是喉镜检查(73.5%)和生活方式调整(87.3%),而只有 60.4% 的参与者认为质子泵抑制剂是一种治疗方法。大多数初级保健医生认为 LPR 诊断不足,需要加强初级预防和提高普通人群的认识:结论:三分之一的初级保健医生对 LPR 一无所知,三分之二的医生不熟悉 RSI。半数以上的医生无法识别 LPR 的所有主要症状,这可能是一个值得关注的问题,因为识别这些症状对于正确诊断至关重要。我们建议加强对医生的教育,让他们了解 LPR、其体征和症状以及 RSI,所有这些都为诊断提供了宝贵的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini. It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.). The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief. Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信