Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Olof Nilsson, Mathias von Beckerath, Johan Knutsson, Fredrik J Landström
{"title":"Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Olof Nilsson, Mathias von Beckerath, Johan Knutsson, Fredrik J Landström","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2418334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.

Aims/objectives: We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.

Results: Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.

Conclusions and significance: The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信