Microbial diversity and biosafety judgment of digestates derived from different biogas plants for agricultural applications.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Małgorzata Czatzkowska, Izabela Wolak, Monika Harnisz, Ewa Korzeniewska
{"title":"Microbial diversity and biosafety judgment of digestates derived from different biogas plants for agricultural applications.","authors":"Małgorzata Czatzkowska, Izabela Wolak, Monika Harnisz, Ewa Korzeniewska","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The composition of microbial communities is the key to effective anaerobic digestion (AD). The microbiome driving the AD process has been extensively researched, whereas the influence of specific substrates on the microbiome of digestate remains insufficiently investigated. Digestate has considerable potential for use in soil fertilization and bioremediation, therefore its biological safety should be monitored. Moreover, the knowledge about the composition of microbial communities and their interconnections in digestate should be extended, due to the impact on soil microbiota and its functionality. The aim of this study was a comprehensive assessment of the (1) sanitary quality, (2) core microbiome, and (3) microbial interactions in digestates collected from three full-scale agricultural biogas plants, with particular emphasis on their applicability from the perspective of the resident microbiota. Analyzed samples of digestate were derived from various substrates used for AD, including plant- and animal-based materials, and industrial waste. The study demonstrated that the phyla Bacillota, Bacteroidota, and Cloacimonadota were the most dominant in digestates regardless of the composition of the processed substrates, however, member composition at the genus level differed significantly between samples. In addition, we observed that microbial genera belonging to the less prevalent phyla play an integral role in the forming of microbial community interactions. Dominant microbial taxa with broad metabolic capabilities, potentially improving soil quality and functionality, have been identified. Moreover, we confirmed, that digestate samples were free of analyzed pathogenic bacteria and parasites. The study results indicate that digestate may have an immense fertilizing and bioremediation potential that has not been fully availed of to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"371 ","pages":"123329"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The composition of microbial communities is the key to effective anaerobic digestion (AD). The microbiome driving the AD process has been extensively researched, whereas the influence of specific substrates on the microbiome of digestate remains insufficiently investigated. Digestate has considerable potential for use in soil fertilization and bioremediation, therefore its biological safety should be monitored. Moreover, the knowledge about the composition of microbial communities and their interconnections in digestate should be extended, due to the impact on soil microbiota and its functionality. The aim of this study was a comprehensive assessment of the (1) sanitary quality, (2) core microbiome, and (3) microbial interactions in digestates collected from three full-scale agricultural biogas plants, with particular emphasis on their applicability from the perspective of the resident microbiota. Analyzed samples of digestate were derived from various substrates used for AD, including plant- and animal-based materials, and industrial waste. The study demonstrated that the phyla Bacillota, Bacteroidota, and Cloacimonadota were the most dominant in digestates regardless of the composition of the processed substrates, however, member composition at the genus level differed significantly between samples. In addition, we observed that microbial genera belonging to the less prevalent phyla play an integral role in the forming of microbial community interactions. Dominant microbial taxa with broad metabolic capabilities, potentially improving soil quality and functionality, have been identified. Moreover, we confirmed, that digestate samples were free of analyzed pathogenic bacteria and parasites. The study results indicate that digestate may have an immense fertilizing and bioremediation potential that has not been fully availed of to date.

不同沼气厂产生的沼渣在农业应用中的微生物多样性和生物安全性判断。
微生物群落的组成是有效厌氧消化(AD)的关键。驱动厌氧消化过程的微生物群落已被广泛研究,而特定基质对沼渣微生物群落的影响仍未得到充分研究。沼渣在土壤施肥和生物修复方面具有相当大的应用潜力,因此应监测其生物安全性。此外,由于沼渣对土壤微生物区系及其功能性的影响,还应该进一步了解沼渣中微生物群落的组成及其相互联系。本研究的目的是全面评估从三座大型农业沼气厂收集的沼渣中的 (1) 卫生质量、(2) 核心微生物群和 (3) 微生物相互作用,特别强调从常住微生物群的角度来看它们的适用性。分析的沼渣样本来自用于厌氧消化(AD)的各种基质,包括植物和动物基质以及工业废物。研究表明,无论加工基质的成分如何,沼渣中最主要的是芽孢杆菌科(Bacillota)、类杆菌科(Bacteroidota)和球菌科(Cloacimonadota)。此外,我们还观察到,在微生物群落相互作用的形成过程中,属于低流行门类的微生物属发挥着不可或缺的作用。我们还发现了具有广泛代谢能力的优势微生物类群,它们有可能改善土壤质量和功能。此外,我们还证实,沼渣样本中没有分析出的病原菌和寄生虫。研究结果表明,沼渣可能具有巨大的肥料和生物修复潜力,但迄今为止尚未得到充分利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信